In the modern era, occupations are regarded as crucial factors contributing to the thriving of individuals and communities. One of the heated debates in this realm is associated with the question of how to make workers satisfied to increase a company’s productivity. Many people adhere to the view that giving the workers various tasks during the day help them not to become bored, while others believe doing the same functions increase their job gratification. I firmly believe companies should not force their workers to do assorted tasks. In what follows, I will cogently pinpoint my most conspicuous reasons to justify my point of view.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that switching between different tasks has a massive overhead which would increase the number of mistakes made by individuals. People adapt what they do during a given period, so shifting to another job requires forgetting their previous adaptations to work on something new. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. About two years ago, I worked in a company as a programmer in the technical division. Because the staff count was not adequate, we had to perform various tasks during the day using different scripting languages. As a result, most of the time, we mixed things up, and produced a lot of bugs and in our codes. Thus, our company decided to hire new staff and give them specific duties about a particular topic to reduce these blunders.
Another equally significant point to be mentioned is that giving unique tasks to group members increases their speed and quality over time. The more time people spend on performing an activity, the faster they get in executing that. In the beginning, our brain or arm muscles are not used to do new assignments, but little by little, they become stronger to perform given tasks. As a result, our performance will be faster and more reliable. For instance, during my internship project, I had to learn a new programming language. Not knowing much about its syntax, I had to search the web for solutions all the time, which was a cumbersome and time-consuming job to do. After a while, I became acquainted and fluent in that language so that I could satisfy my ubiquitous needs. Consequently, I wrote my codes rapidly without any errors.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that giving workers unique tasks is much beneficial rather than overwhelm them with numerous duties. Because their error rate will be decreased, plus they will become more familiar with the job over time, thus they will do it quicker.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in brief, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2181.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02534562212 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8263813403 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564516129032 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 676.8 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8152588468 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1363636364 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237815333711 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578468635577 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531768312748 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150526876269 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216046156604 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.