Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
No one can deny the importance of task diversity between employees for better performance during the workday. In this regard, people's opinions are divided as to whether doing different types of duty have influence on worker satisfaction or not. It is my firm conviction that doing various types of tasks by employees play a remarkable role in improving worker's living standards. For a number of reasons and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
My primary reason is that with applying this approach workers gain new and more skills and have a better view about themselves. Vividly, individuals with a wide range of abilities are happier than other people in their social class because these kinds of people are more acceptable in workplaces. Moreover, workers with having different types of tasks to do gain new experiences, skills and can avoid recurring and boredom in their work time. As a result, change in the routine tasks that doing by workers in companies and offices improve their employees to more satisfied and happy people, consequently with this procedure the companies flourishing faster with active workers.
Second, with doing varied responsibilities workers have a chance to making new connections in different parts of the office. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own experience. You see, my father working in a bank as a client. He just prepare meeting time table and compiling some documentaries, and all the time complains about his job. After a while, his manager allowed him for doing some works in other parts of the bank. This way was so useful for him cause he making new friends in other sections and being more sociable in his workplace. So, as you can see I really believe that a new network with new friends can broaden one's vision apart from routine daily life.
In light of the above-mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that performing various tasks by employees in workplace not only is a great way for improving their personality to more self-confidence and happier mood but also can help them to construct new connections and friend networks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...is regard, peoples opinions are divided as to whether doing different types of duty have infl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 515, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'makes'.
Suggestion: makes
...This way was so useful for him cause he making new friends in other sections and being...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 594, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , as” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d being more sociable in his workplace. So, as you can see I really believe that a new...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 678, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ew network with new friends can broaden ones vision apart from routine daily life. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, moreover, really, second, so, while, apart from, as to, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02228412256 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81752361756 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557103064067 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2827956963 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.6875 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4375 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207460311291 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723534134893 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564656821997 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129852051162 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692422916888 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.