Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
It is not easy to deny the fact that employees' working efficiency would accelerate if they deal with similar tasks every day. This fact leads impressionable people to generate the idea that workers are more satisfied if they do similar works all day long. However, as far as sense of achievement, diversity of work, improvement of ablity are put into consideration, I firmly hold the belief that it is more enjoyable for workers to try various kinds of tasks during the workday.
First of all, it is more enjoyable to cope with different kinds of tasks, since a sense of achievement emerges when people finish various tasks. If workers are faced with similar tasks all day long, though they would be more and more experienced in finishing the tasks, it does not bring too much satisfaction. Even if they could finish their tasks in a perfect way, they might not feel the happiness of achieveing something at all. On the other hand, if they are assigned to different tasks on different workdays, every day would be a new challege to them. As a result, they would do the best and prepare for the worst. If they finish the task fast and successfully, they would be very satisfied. If they meet with some troubles or setbacks, they would resort to more resources and try again and again.
Secondly, the diversity of work, would facilitate the satisfaction of the employees. Take the example of my brother, who used to work as an English teacher in a teaching institution for young kids. Bored with the similar courses he had to face with every day, he quit his job and found a new job as a journalist. Having the chance to meet with diverse people from different regions and positions, every day is a new start for him. Before each interview, he would make a lot of preparation. Furthermore, he has to spend much time on categorizing the information after the interview. Though his new job takes her much more time and energy, he is quite satisfied to do such a job.
Thirdly, some voice arises that it is much easier to do the similar task every day, which saves adequate time and energy for the emplyees. However, workers would be obesses with boredness when they are exposed to the same or similar tasks. Furthermore, they do not have the chance to try other tasks, which could be a valuable opportunity to improve their ability. Just imagine that if they only do similar tasks all day long, it may be the case that they are not able to do other tasks. Tragedies would happen if they lose their current job. Not able to do other things, they would suffer from a extremely hard time to find a new job.
In conclusion, as far as sense of achievement, diversity of work and imporvment of ability are put into consideration, i believe it is more satisfying to cope with diverse tasks than do similar tasks every day. Some people may oppose me but I think they might compromise after being shown to my essay.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a perfect way" with adverb for "perfect"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
.... Even if they could finish their tasks in a perfect way, they might not feel the happiness of a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 477, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e each interview, he would make a lot of preparation. Furthermore, he has to spen...
^^
Line 7, column 596, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...do other things, they would suffer from a extremely hard time to find a new job. ...
^
Line 9, column 120, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... of ability are put into consideration, i believe it is more satisfying to cope w...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, as to, i think, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2397.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 518.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62741312741 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59218968914 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.440154440154 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 752.4 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 12.0 3.51792114695 341% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7512263962 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.88 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.72 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.24 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.450359434408 0.236089414692 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135107314997 0.076458572812 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980114626264 0.0737576698707 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276162625475 0.150856017488 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112619796957 0.0645574589148 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.