Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday rather than when they do similar tasks all day long.
In our sophisticated world, jobs play a vital role in people’s life. Therefore, there always had been some controversial questions about the best conditions of working that provides workers with higher productivity as well as a deep sense of satisfaction. One question which arises in this regard is that it is better for workers to do a singular job for whole the day or they should do different types of tasks. I, for one, think that workers should do various kinds of tasks during a workday, and I will elaborate on my reasons in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, in the modern era, people spend a large amount of time of their life in the workplace that means their happiness and their satisfaction is profoundly dependent on their jobs. Many psychologically studies have shown that human beings try to get rid of the monotony of life in various aspects of life. Individuals tend to wear various clothes, socializing with a variety of people, eating different kinds of foods and so forth. Therefore, when it comes to doing jobs, people definitely prefer to avoid being exhausted and bored by doing a single job for the whole that day. The more sense of satisfaction provided by the job, the more productivity the workers have. A personal example can drive this notion home. I am a processing engineer and everyday work with many workers. Some workers who do the same job during the day are not energetic and efficient as much as the workers who do various types of tasks.
The other important point is that these days every society encounters an economic crisis, and it is very important for workers to broaden their skills and abilities in order to reach job security. Nowadays, many companies cannot resist financial problems, and they have to fire their workers frequently. In such a circumstance, the ones who have learnt various tasks are less likely to lose their jobs. When a worker is fired, the company needs to train others the new skills in order to compensate the absence of previous workers, and it would cost a fortune. Hence, they prefer to preserve their skilled and well-experienced workers who are profitable. For example, the company where I am working, put more value on the workers who experience working with various machines rather than the workers who have learnt a single task because they know in harsh situation these multitasks workers are more handful.
All in all, taking the two mentioned reasons into account, I firmly assert that it is better for workers to do various tasks. In this way not only are they happier and productive at work but also they are less likely to be unemployed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 549, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n my reasons in the following paragraphs First and foremost in the modern era peo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 914, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he workers who do various types of tasks The other important point is that these ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2149.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 452.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75442477876 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5935724738 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491150442478 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.6003584229 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 452.0 20.1344086022 2245% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 48.9658058833 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2149.0 100.406767564 2140% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 452.0 20.6045352989 2194% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 73.0 5.45110844103 1339% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358355544949 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.358355544949 0.076458572812 469% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226308770165 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00951717911305 0.0645574589148 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 226.9 11.7677419355 1928% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -378.84 58.1214874552 -652% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.10430107527 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 178.4 10.1575268817 1756% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.75 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 29.06 8.01818996416 362% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 10.002688172 560% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 182.8 10.0537634409 1818% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 56.0 10.247311828 546% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.