Without a shadow of a doubt, the types of tasks are tightly correlated with the satisfaction of workers. A glance at people's attitude towards the task types brings to a light question that has been asked several times, namely, are workers tend to be more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do than do similar tasks all day long? When it comes to my point of view, I am strongly in favor of this claim and will elaborate on what rationale my perspective is based on in the following paragraphs.
The first reason worth mentioning is that distinctive types of tasks can better stimulate workers' brains and make them stay in the motivated situation. To illustrate more, the ability for people to concentrate on a certain task is limited and the rate of cost energy is gradually increasing as the time spent on the only task marches on. However, compared to devoting all energy to a single task, multiple tasks can stimulate different areas of the brain and require the brain to coordinate body parts with energy properly allocated. Through this working manner, the brain can hardly get exhausted, which will further develop the satisfaction of tasks.
Moreover, another essential factor is that complicated tasks can arise a sense of being needed. The tendency to adventure and deal with difficulties, more often than not, is an intrinsic personality for most people. When they are coping with the dilemma, they have to take advantage of their talents and available resources to construct a model to analyze and solve the problem. Based on their arduous effort, they can have a fairly good idea of the problem, which is regarded as the main source of self-achievement. However, in the contrast, assigned to simple task to repeat the same steps day after day, everyone will be nervous and may be afraid of being replaced. And that is why those workers from factories are always complaining about their jobs and eagering for a stable work opportunity.
A voice arises that doing the same task is easier for people, which can improve their satisfaction on jobs, while this claim needs to be scrutinized meticulously. Admittedly, doing the same job doesn't require people to spend their time learning to skills and apply them into practice, on the filp side, this work pattern can be harmful sometimes. The statistic data indicates as the time that used to pay attention on the same thing increasing, the possibility of making accidents is also rising. Taking the famous movie acted by Chaplin as a compelling example. In this movie, Chaplin played a role of worker in a factory, what he did was simply deal with the parts produced from the last machine. One day he could not continue to attach attention on parts that he should be responsible for because he was exhausted after being repeating same action for hours, then accident happened, a broken part was going to the next step without being changed, workers in the production line were shocked by this part. Finally, the whole production line was in a mess. That is an obvious disadvantage of doing a same task for a long time.
In conclusion, drawing upon the reasons I have mentioned above, I strongly agree with this opinion. I believe my opponents will yiled after being shown to my article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...end to be more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do than do similar ta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 562, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... allocated. Through this working manner, the brain can hardly get exhausted, whic...
^^
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ulously. Admittedly, doing the same job doesnt require people to spend their time lear...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 647, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'dealt'.
Suggestion: dealt
...er in a factory, what he did was simply deal with the parts produced from the last m...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 15.1003584229 212% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2712.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 559.0 407.700716846 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85152057245 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86242540663 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64682820495 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 299.0 212.727598566 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53488372093 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 848.7 618.680645161 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4925956247 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.913043478 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3043478261 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47826086957 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284984807328 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758472715705 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104347004764 0.0737576698707 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167185822638 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131585803044 0.0645574589148 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 86.8835125448 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.