Work is the most important part of our lives. The efficiency of a society is measured by the degree and the quality of its work. Work is omnipresent in our daily life, for the young generation the work is embodied in the form of studies and the older ones they have proper professional jobs in companies, factories, schools, municipalities...etc. That said, workers perform different tasks during the workday, but others have the same similar tasks day in, day out. In my view, employees who do various tasks during the workday can have more satisfaction in their lives than their peers who only exercise the same tasks over and over again for two crucial reasons.
First of all, it would help workers to avoid monotony. When people do the same chore during the workday, it would result in boredness and this will eventually, have a negative effect on their work performance. When the quality of their work is degraded, their satisfaction on themselves in terms of self-esteem and happiness follow up with the same destiny. For example, my father who worked before in a steel company for ten years as a lifter, he was responsible for the transportation of steel from one unit to another (the production unit to the stock unit). After three years of exercising the same task, he started to feel the impact in his life, he has a significant problem with the concentration during his work and also he expressed signs of depression. My mother advised him to consult a psychiatrist and the conclusion of the doctor was that his routine job affected heavily his mental health. As you can see, having different tasks on a job can have a beneficial contributes to our health.
Second, workers who do different tasks during the workday keep their level of eager and interest consistent. Workers with different tasks keep expanding and developing their skills in each of their chores by holding a good balance of rotation. For instance, in my country primary school teachers, they do not only teach one and specific course but they teach all the grade courses from mathematics to language comprehension. They always try to develop themselves by acquiring more knowledge in different fields, so that they can provide the best education to their pupils. Also, the variance of their teaching schedule is fundamental, one morning is reading, another is dictation and so on, to keep them excited about their jobs. Therefore, course rotation and expanding knowledge are keys for the primary school teachers to achieve their satisfaction and they will escape the loophole of monotony and the sullen life. This experience shows how the variance of tasks can help in achieving satisfaction.
In sum, though some people may disagree with this point of view because they are advocates for specialization in tasks, I truly believe the mixture of having different tasks give the workers some colors in their lives. Not only because it would help avoid the monotonous and dreary life by also it would keep us avid by a constant self-development. Employers should adopt this policy on a wide range because it would improve the outcomes for the working industries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'transport'
Suggestion: transport
...pany, for ten years as a lifter. He did transported the steel from one unit to another the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, for example, for instance, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2541.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 517.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91489361702 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78845861069 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502901353965 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 776.7 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4371588517 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.875 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5416666667 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29597017198 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802650675396 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803628614606 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184820656708 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658292189501 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.