Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Without any shadow of a doubt, the occupation has an inextricable part of the life of everyone. Should people realize the importance of this element on prospering of human's life, they will ponder to the influence of this fact much more scrupulously. Some people are inclined towards the performing diversity of tasks in the workplace, while others believe that having different types of deeds in the work would make the situation more perplex. I do find the idea of the former group more in accordance with that of mine. To support my stance, in the course of this essay, I will substantiate my viewpoints.
To begin with, since the tendency to variety is closely tied to the nature of the human, majority of people penchant to have a variety of tasks during the day. Although having a different kind of activities in a day would need more energy, it could enhance the level of motivation in among the employees and inspire them to be more interested in their deeds. Moreover, it is crystal clear that only one type of tasks and similar ones should be so boring, decrease the workers' motivation and diminish the efficiency of their performance. On top of that drawing line to the quality of jobs in a workplace could have a catastrophic effect on both economic of company and headway of the employees As an example, several years ago, when I was in an internship in power plant of Tehran, every employee had only a bunch of limited responsibilities. Thus, in this situation, it was obviously witnessed that there was not favorable and boosting climate for prospering the workers. How would their boss expect a high level of performance among his employees, without any provoking element?
Another reason which deserves to say some words here is that having diversity in the work brings more experiences to the individuals. Obviously, hardly can anyone deny this fact that who has more experiences in different kinds of vocation would be more successful in his or her career. Under this circumstance, people learn more and better than who has skill in one type field. To illustrate my point, I would like to mention some available statistic results. The results of a survey which is conducted recently in my country mention that multi-skilled and sophisticated people are more successful in their life, thereby, experience in different majors open doors to them and provide more opportunities in real life, for example, high salary jobs for them.
In brief, by contemplating the aforementioned arguments, one soon realizes that existence diversity in the tasks of daily work has a striking influence on not only flourishing employees but also boosting economic of society. Ergo, I strongly advocate this point that it is better to have different tasks in the daily career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
... ones should be so boring, decrease the workers motivation and diminish the efficiency ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y can anyone deny this fact that who has more experiences in different kinds of v...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, in brief, kind of, to begin with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2315.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 466.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9678111588 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85389411785 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517167381974 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 737.1 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.2812413091 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.611111111 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8888888889 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72222222222 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198481888314 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571065402129 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403188595704 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112923970529 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022905040349 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.