Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Nowadays modern companies try to increase job satisfaction between their employees and therefore reduce the risk of costly resource rotations as much as possible. One of the parameters that human resource experts has mentioned effective in riasing job satisfaction is variety in worker's everyday tasks. It has been observed that for several reasons usually employees that have many different types of tasks as more satisfied than the ones that have one specific routine task. Lets discuss possible reasons of this observation.
Firstly, human's are natuarally inclined to variety, and they get bored from repeteation very easily. Similarly, even during their working hours people prefer to have diversity in their tasks, and prevent them from getting bored. Furthermore, variety is so important for people that even when they are doing tasks that is very interesting for them they prefer to do different types of things. I have a little niece, which is 2 years old. She really enjoys playing with her toy bear, but I have noticed when she plays and hour with the said bear she becomes bored with it and tries to do something else. As you see, even very young children get tired of doing same things again and again.
Secondly, when workers do different types of tasks during a day they will have a feeling that because of this variety they will have the opportunity of learning new things. Most employees will feel insecure about their job, if it is a specific and repetitive task, that can be learned easily. They will hypotesize that replacing them will be a very easy task for their employers, and because of that will not have the feeling of acompolishments about what they are doing.
Finally, Usually when someone is doing exact specific thing for a very long time, eventually they will loose focus, and their percision in whatever they are doing will be decreased. Last week I read this article in a sycology magezine, it was about an experiment performed on a group of students to find a way to increase their performance in school. In this study students who have four different subjects during a day showed much more performance than the ones will just one subject. Also, students with different subjects were less tired at the end of day. This experiment shows that suprisingly everyone need to switch to another type of activity to stay enthusiastic towards what they are doing.
Given all facts discussed, workers will be more satisfied if they do different types of things in the coarse of a day, because naturally verity appeals to humans, and they will learn when there is diversity in their tasks, and also they will be more focused on whatever they are doing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 378, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ral reasons usually employees that have many different types of tasks as more satisfied than t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 477, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...es that have one specific routine task. Lets discuss possible reasons of this observ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er toy bear, but I have noticed when she plays and hour with the said bear she be...
^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
... a very long time, eventually they will loose focus, and their percision in whatever ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, really, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2235.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92290748899 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5288079957 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497797356828 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 692.1 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1740296153 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.631578947 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8947368421 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73684210526 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427355897286 0.236089414692 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122959044516 0.076458572812 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12703193023 0.0737576698707 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247063174909 0.150856017488 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591037127375 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.