the workers have to cope with whether various types of tasks or similar tasks
It goes without any shadowing of doubt that human beings' satisfaction with every aspect of their life especially their job and workplace is very important. Regarding the very feeling, there is a heated controversy that the workers have to cope with whether various types of tasks or similar tasks. In my perspective as far as gratification of employees is concerned, it is better for them carrying similar tasks. This approach is a good opportunity for them not only to get promotion in the future but also to deal with all aspects of life.
To begin with, considering the galloping rate of increase in science, technology and so forth, societies and managers are in the demand of adept people. In other hand, people can be experts in their job and field only if they have up-to-the-minute related information and handle many the same projects before. In contrast, those people that are forced to address many different duties in their workplace, maybe they can handle multiple works at the same time, but only superficially. They will not be at all skillful people in their major field. Accordingly, their managers will not consider them among influential workers that once day maybe get promotion. In other side, if they wanted to apply in a new job position, they would not be as the first choices because they are really maladroit.
Secondly, job is not what life is all about, I mean, people's life is more complex which need time to be lived properly. Unfortunately, different kinds of tasks in a workplace take a lot of time of employees since they need time to do research, to obtain knowledge around the matters, itemize them, to name but a few. They not only will be very busy in their office-time but also bring many of their tasks at home when they should communicate with their families, do their interested, sleep and so more. This result of various kinds of one's tasks in a workday will definitely crush their soul and beat down them. After a while, they will become a frustrated and anxious person, subsequently they will not be able to do their best in both social and private life. For instance, my uncle used to work years in a company with a lot of duties there. Nevertheless, he had been hired as a mechanical engineer there, he had to do testing analysis, go to workshop, manage some official processes in company, and a lot of more. I remember that each night we were their guests, he was in his room to fulfill his jobs' tasks. He was not among us in any family gathering. My mother says that "he was really happy and energetic during his youth, but after working there, he became a sad and solitary person". I really can say that their children and wife did not receive any positive relationship with him until he quit the very career.
In summary, with all this taken into account, I do believe that it is not beneficial for anyone to carry different kinds of tasks in a workday. If one did so, she would be unsuccessful not only in her job but also in other aspects of life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...thout any shadowing of doubt that human beings satisfaction with every aspect of their...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 363, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...those people that are forced to address many different duties in their workplace, maybe they c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 536, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...o more. This result of various kinds of ones tasks in a workday will definitely crus...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, may, nevertheless, really, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, i mean, in contrast, in summary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 84.0 52.1666666667 161% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2486.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 533.0 407.700716846 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66416510319 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80487177365 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64559364877 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508442776735 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 788.4 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 23.0 9.59856630824 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2421189694 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.086956522 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1739130435 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04347826087 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173129545311 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580125742805 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127941893453 0.0737576698707 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129519417003 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106372842471 0.0645574589148 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.