Sometimes filmmakers make movies that are based on books. When a movie is based on a book, some people prefer to read the book before watching the movie. Other people prefer to read the book only after they have watched the movie. Which do you prefer and why?
As time goes out, film maker innovates new types of films, one of them we see a lot these days is based on books. As both films and books which films have been made based on are available, some people are willing to watch movies before reading books. Others prefer otherwise and I, as a person, subscribe to this idea that it is more reasonable and beneficial for individuals to read books first and after that watch movies.
In first place, it is not to mention that the most people read book and watch movies to keep their mind active and enhance their sense of imaginary. As far as this primary goal is concerned, I think it is more conceivable read books before watching movies based on them. Such a point of view in my own self are in the ground of axiomatic facts of moves and effect of book in each individual. A single book will be differently interpreted by different individuals depend on their perspectives, so accordingly a film maker who has made a movie based on a book use his or her commentary of books to create characters and events. This unavoidable effect will be happened in different aspects of a movie like the appearance of characters. They cannot cover all part of a book, so they must brief it in a short story and make film based on it, consequently they may boldface some parts which are important in their eyes. All of these results can impact on book reader if they saw movies formerly. When they read the books, they cannot at all think free of movies' impacts, in fact film makers' horizons. During a film we just try to interpret following happening one after another or guess about the end of movies, but in books we will be more involved, and we have more mysteries to think about them because not only they are longer than movies, but also they don’t carry a second commentary of occurrences' concept which are fulfilled in movies by film makers. If we watch movies previously and then read book, we would deprive our imaginary power from imagining appearances of characters like their face, voice and so on.
Secondly, it is not avoidable that some films based on books make people unenthusiastic to read these books, because of some reasons like bad playing of actors who make the characters of books or poor film music and camerawork. Following that, it is probable that individuals who watch movies before reading books don’t have a powerful penchant to read them, it is missing chance to read many useful and advantageous books. For instance, recently a film maker, whose name allude me at the moment, have made a very poor movie based on one of the greatest books around the world, War and Peace by Leo Tolstoy. It was weak not only in picturing characters of the book but also in choosing necessary details. I fortunately had read the book before watching mentioned-movie, but in contrast my friend watch just movie. This movie has made her disappointed, even I encourage her a lot to read the book, but she doesn’t so. I think such a bad movie take my friend's chance to read such a priced book.
In summary, by seeing all of these considerations, I think if we want to involve our power of imaginary and thought we must read books in first place and after that watch the movies based of them. Who can deny the negative effects of movies, those watch before reading books, on such goals?
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for instance, i think, in contrast, in fact, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 88.0 52.1666666667 169% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2758.0 1977.66487455 139% => OK
No of words: 598.0 407.700716846 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61204013378 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94510247834 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57176282919 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444816053512 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 861.3 618.680645161 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.1241027603 48.9658058833 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.363636364 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1818181818 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.505661299621 0.236089414692 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167464261573 0.076458572812 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823971745331 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.343175369447 0.150856017488 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710453832724 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 58.1214874552 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.