Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you have never taken before Why

Essay topics:

Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study, or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you have never taken before? Why?

It is generally agreed that teaching has a pivotal role in graduation quality in all universities. Professors who instruct the material of courses define this quality and directly impact it. Teaching style and method is a master key in instructing evaluation and understanding of the courses and the professor is the bottleneck of it. Some students prefer to take a course and gain knowledge from different instructors, however, others are against this idea and believe that examined teachers are better than the new one. Although it is hard to reach a consensus on this issue, I do believe that taking a course with a professor that already passed the course with them is a better decision. The following reasons would elaborate on my idea.
To commence, one of the main criteria that have a big impact on teaching quality is teaching style. It is clear that the way that instructors choose to transfer the concept of course material is a master key in teaching. In addition, a clear teaching structure helps students to follow the material and get involved in the classes. For instance, I took a course in mathematics last year and the professor always asked questions to compel students to take part in a discussion in order to understand better. Indeed I like to take another course with that professor. Also, I am pretty familiar with the criterion for getting a good mark in the class.
As time passes and students become closer to graduation they become more aware of the final mark important to finding a good job in the future. We know that when you are familiar with a professor based on previous experiences, you can get a better result in the course based on those experiences. To put it in general words, you pretty much know what he/she wants for homework, and also the criterion for the final mark. I remember when I passed a course in chemistry, I found that the professor persist in homework and assigns a big part of the final mark to them. It is crystal clear that when I take another course with that professor, I try to present HomeWorks in the best way.
Last but not least, all instructors refer to the previous courses that they taught and there are no exemptions. When we take a course with those professors we almost know part of the new course and it would be familiar to us. For instance, they almost say in the previous session, in the past course, and so on. Therefore, when we took a course with them before, we know what they mention.
Drawing upon the reasons, although some exemptions are excluded from general rules, I believe that taking courses that are taught by instructors whom I have already passed classes with them is a better option. This decision, not only helps me to understand the material of the course but also assists me to get a better marks in the course.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 508, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...scussion in order to understand better. Indeed I like to take another course with that...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 20, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ks in the best way. Last but not least, all instructors refer to the previous co...
^^
Line 4, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the past course, and so on. Therefore, when we took a course with them before, ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in general, of course

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2320.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 495.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68686868687 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62389948071 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.430303030303 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 720.9 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.397062637 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.869565217 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5217391304 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78260869565 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330633845164 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938047912301 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746642797666 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181864012042 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192231314985 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 508, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...scussion in order to understand better. Indeed I like to take another course with that...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 20, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ks in the best way. Last but not least, all instructors refer to the previous co...
^^
Line 4, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the past course, and so on. Therefore, when we took a course with them before, ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in general, of course

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2320.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 495.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68686868687 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62389948071 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.430303030303 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 720.9 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.397062637 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.869565217 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5217391304 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78260869565 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330633845164 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938047912301 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746642797666 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181864012042 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192231314985 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.