Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups, and all members of the group receive the same grade (mark) on the project. Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to evaluate students?
It is generally agreed today that doing a project during study at universities is a master key not only to increasing the knowledge of students but also to examining the information that they have obtained. In addition, grading their work which defines their quality in a course is a controversial issue. Due to its essential characteristics, there is a long-standing discussion among universities, some teachers support the idea that students work on projects in groups and all of them get the same mark and others are against this idea. Although it is a little hard to reach a consensus on this issue, I, myself, do believe that working in a group and getting the same grade presents a better outcome. It can result in effective work, constructive interaction among group members, and improve the quality of work by using new and different ideas.
To commence, one of the compelling reasons that proves my thesis is that teamwork is more effective than working alone based on many scientific types of research. On the one hand, students in a team can reach out to others to share their ideas, on the other hand, they can share the responsibilities and do part of the work. By doing so, they focus on a small segment and finish it at a right time. As a result, students learn to cooperate in the project by sharing new ideas in order to handle part of a project as a team member. In fact, it is the definition of teamwork that is an essential tool in today's competitive world.
Let us continue by considering the fact having interaction with other people can prepare the student for future life. It is worth mentioning that the goal of the education system is to prepare students to be part of a prosperous society as long as the development of a country is concerned. In short, working in a team can teach students the concept of living and surviving in a community in which cooperation always is above all. For instance, they learn many useful and applicable skills such as respecting others, attending social programs, and so on so forth.
Last but not the least, new and different ideas result in solving complex problems. When students participate in a group to do a project, it does not matter what they do, but the idea that they are sharing is important. Being part of a group motivates them to think about solutions. It is crystal clear that many rational minds are more reliable than one single. As an example, sometimes a simple idea or a comment can solve a significant problem like my friend's comment in our mathematics group. I recall that one time we tried to solve a problem, but we could not come up with a logical way, suddenly she said, '' gravity is negative'', by raising this fact, just a few words, she solve a big problem. To put it in general words, as long as people present some ideas in a group, they deserve to take an equal grade, because it pushes them to think and think
To draw upon the reasons, although some exceptions are excluded from the general rule, I supported the idea that student do their projects in group and all members get the same grade. This policy presents many benefits for students such as working effectively, having constructive interaction with other members, and motivating them to solve the problem with different and new ideas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 613, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...p with a logical way, suddenly she said, gravity is negative, by raising this fac...
^^
Line 7, column 680, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'solves'.
Suggestion: solves
...aising this fact, just a few words, she solve a big problem. To put it in general wor...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for instance, in addition, in fact, in general, in short, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 52.1666666667 157% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2726.0 1977.66487455 138% => OK
No of words: 578.0 407.700716846 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71626297578 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90322654589 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72272609518 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477508650519 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 848.7 618.680645161 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.8819857898 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.909090909 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286457554097 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777678623908 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713944314978 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168946846753 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0870012786982 0.0645574589148 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.