You are a boss working at a large company, and you need to hire a new worker. What are the advantages and disadvantages of hiring an older (40 years old+) or a younger worker (25 years+)? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Every Business and entrepreneur aims for their economy to thrive. Depending on the job requirement, some companies prefer to appoint older staff of 40+ years old, whereas some favour in hiring young workers. Both types of workforce has its own advantages and disadvantages. Personally, I would prefer to hire younger workers over the older ones.
First of all, having an older employing invites treasure of professional experience in the company which attract the customers who could get benefit with a better outcome. For example, a tertiary health care centre in my home town has well experienced medical team especially the surgeons and physicians. My neighbours prefer to consult and get treated in that hospital than new private clinics nearby which have less waiting time. On asking the reason I learned that the hospital has more experienced staff and so they have more trust in their treatment than the young clinician in our community. However, I believe that the older practitioners are not open to advanced practices as they are more comfortable in their older way of professional execution. Despite of that the hospital has to pay them a substantial salary than the young fresher.
Second, young workers even though have very less experience in the field of their ability, but they are more updated and excited to work and bring new ideas for the development of their employer. For instance, my uncle was an owner of a grocery store of special products which brought him limited income. When his son, after seeking a graduation degree in marketing and finance, started to work with him, he sprawled the business and pulled it to new heights. They got a new bigger location for opening a departmental store and they included special culinary products from different cuisine all over the world. This would not have happened without implementing his son’s new ideas for expanding the business.
While leading a huge company, I would prefer to higher young staff. This is because, generally, in contrast to the older workers, the young employees are more enthusiastic to learn new techniques in training and they are adaptable to recent working practices. For example, my husband’s telecom company is one of the well know big companies in our city. They hire and train young staff at less pay-scale. So they have more hands in the work force at less cost. To be specific, they can hire 4 young workers in place of an older worker with salary of $ 15000. Moreover, they give promotion to their current employees with some salary increment, and thus there is no need to hire older high paying staff. This strategy not only brings profit to the company but also reduces unemployment rate.
In conclusion, appointing a young worker or an older staff completely depends on the need of the job and the company. I, Being a boss of large company, prefer hiring a young worker because they are adaptable to learn new skills in training and hiring them at relatively lower pay can bring a large workforce to work as a team.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
... young workers. Both types of workforce has its own advantages and disadvantages. P...
^^^
Line 4, column 556, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$15000'.
Suggestion: $15000
...place of an older worker with salary of $ 15000. Moreover, they give promotion to their...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, thus, well, whereas, while, as for, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2527.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 510.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95490196078 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75217629947 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67523767377 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511764705882 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 779.4 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4227432021 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.08 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211937723436 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627502844068 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685268172749 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146962566151 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875138517773 0.0645574589148 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.