Honesty is the most important character of any individual and it is necessary for a person to be honest in order to be successful throughout his/her life. In fact, honesty makes life to form based on real rather than lie and flattery. In a large scale, in a team, in my viewpoint, there are few, if any, criteria that are more important than honesty in the assessment of a leader's character. A leader's being honest will affect his/her group's honesty as well. First, it tends to form a spirit of responsibility among the team members and second, it probably brings discipline for the team.
Let's suppose a leader who is honest. This leader, due to his/her honesty, won't lie, so this person will have a sense of ethics that makes him/her to be responsible. Having a spirit of responsibility tends to create a mutually sense of trustworthy and respect between group's member because this will make members to be punctual. In contrast, a leader with no or low sense of responsibility, probably won't accept his/her errors, so members will have a response for his irrational behavior. This may bring about a poisoning space for the team and if this action continues, by killing member's motivation and creating an unsecure condition, the leader will dramatically reduce their efficiency. Thus, having a spirit of responsibility is more likely to increase member's endeavor because it makes a situation where a man's word is a man's bond. Therefore, under this situation it can be said that members learn to be committed to their work and have a better feeling about their works.
The other personality trait which ensues from honesty is discipline. When a leader is honest, he/she almost try to discipline his/herself because team members will count on him and whatever the leader says or does, they will follow suit. Based on discipline, the goal of the team will be achieved at the exact or with little tolerance of the time and it will directly affect on the credibility of the group. On the other hand, in the absence of discipline as a leader's personality trait, some of the group's member—the ones whose personality is formed based on discipline—may disillusion and as the time passes, they may even leave the group. Besides, managing the team will have no meaning because there is no framework in which a leather asks members for a result and returning this feature as a team principle will hardly occur. Finally, no one can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that time is gold and people should use their time in an efficient way. At the presence of discipline, members learn how to manage their time in order to submit their chores on time and by doing so they can prevent of wasting time whether at the team or they personal life.
As mentioned above, in my point of view, honesty is the most important thing that a leader has to have. Two reasons have been explained about the advantages of the honesty; being responsible and discipline. By means of these features it is alleged that the group's success is greatly guaranteed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
That a parent let their children to prac...
^^^
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...to live a happy life. Because as far as Im concerned, parents will be happy when t...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rson are two reasons for my approval. It can be said that, when a parent encou...
^^^
Line 2, column 655, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I've
...n when they forced me to play Tar while Ive loved Piano whole my life. Ive spent 16...
^^^
Line 2, column 686, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I've
...ar while Ive loved Piano whole my life. Ive spent 16 years playing Tar and I had no...
^^^
Line 2, column 1086, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a friend' or simply 'friends'?
Suggestion: a friend; friends
...es which are forced to, but if they see a friends of them in the future who achieved what...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll be depressed in their future life. The other reason is that, by encouraging...
^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an excellent way" with adverb for "excellent"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... to make their life important decisions in an excellent way. Besides, as the children get older, in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 823, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... himself thinks that what he should do. Lets imagine parents who cannot make a decis...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hemselves, what a disaster it can be! As a conclusion, in my viewpoint its bet...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, i think, in addition, in contrast, as a result, as well as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 83.0 43.0788530466 193% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2493.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 539.0 407.700716846 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62523191095 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81833721656 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49458850983 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.437847866419 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 739.8 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.4861229044 48.9658058833 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.210526316 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3684210526 20.6045352989 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.68421052632 5.45110844103 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0421715935206 0.236089414692 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.023620338154 0.076458572812 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0303270248162 0.0737576698707 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0395261065374 0.150856017488 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184133260377 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.1575268817 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.