summarize
According to the reading, the number of sea otters has been rapidly decreased which has grown concern for the researchers because they are an important role in the ecology of the coastal ecosystem. Two reasons were hypothesized. First, the water pollution and second, they might be eaten by the predators. Based on the lecture, both reasons are rejected. The comparisons are stated in details hereunder.
First, the text has stated that researchers have got some samples from the water and they have seen that oil—which has produce because of the industrial chemical pollution—was existed in the water. The lecturer opposes this hypothesize because she says that investigates have been shown that there is no sea otter dead in the coast. If the pollution was the true reason, investigations would reveal some sea otters dead in the coast.
Second, by considering the text, because the number of seals and sea lions are decreased as well, they've again returned to the pollution hypothesize. If it didn't be, this measurable disappearing in these sea animals might be because a great number of predators which have eaten them but the predators of these animals rather to hunt bigger animals like whales. In contrast, the lecturer against this idea because investigates again show that there were no whale there because they've left there as a result of human hunting so the predators have nothing to eat but these sea animals.
Third, based on the context, they've thought that an uneven pattern which has happened in Alaska is as a result of water pollution because the number of sea otters has reduced in some location, while it had remained in other parts. Some scientists think this condition is influenced by some water problem. On the other hand, the lecturer disagrees this phenomenon as well. She thinks that the theory is better explained by the orca predation rather than pollutions. In locations in which orca predations have a better access, the number of sea otters will greatly be reduced. Hence, the number of sea otters will be increased in shallow or rocky locations because orca predations are so big an animal that cannot access to these environments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they've
...ls and sea lions are decreased as well, theyve again returned to the pollution hypothe...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ned to the pollution hypothesize. If it didnt be, this measurable disappearing in the...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 477, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they've
... that there were no whale there because theyve left there as a result of human hunting...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 30, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they've
...nimals. Third, based on the context, theyve thought that an uneven pattern which ha...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, second, so, third, well, while, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1373.03311258 132% => OK
No of words: 360.0 270.72406181 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05277777778 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67023921571 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480555555556 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.0 419.366225166 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.154222153 49.2860985944 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1764705882 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.