Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Far from now, it has been orally proven that people cannot leave without one another meaning that they interdependently connect each other. In this regard, some people think that it would be better to continue an old relationship, while others, including me, think otherwise. Supports for this idea are manifold, but two of which are elaborated upon hereunder.
To begin with, as the time passes, individuals' intellectual tendency as well as their religious beliefs, will change or even turn in some cases. In this regard, people are more likely to be happier when they spend their time with friends who have the same ideology as theirs. This is, because they no longer are needed to discuss or argue about their way of thinking. Besides, people with the same or similar ideology can speak with a broad spectrum of topics meaning that they are more likely to enjoy their free time. In contrast, friends staying with each other even when their tendencies have been changed can be determined like a complete butterfly that is tried to be kept in its past cocoon. I have experienced this bad feeling when I have tried to maintain my friendship with an 18-year friend. At the end, we have both understood that it is better to continue this relation like two simple friends rather than disguise our relation as two happy friends while we were always contacting each other.
Moreover, there are some external circumstances which are becoming bolder these days than before effecting relations. Migration in the top issue in this regard. There is a Persian proverb that says, "If you walk away from my view, you will walk away from my heart." In fact, this can be interpreted that when people are close together, they can have more fun. Thus, those people who can make new friends for themselves can be said that are the ones who are happier. New friends, in addition, because they are close enough can have a better understanding of one another's emotions, for they can more speak with each other. Friends, in my point of view, continue their relation by their common memories that they had had once created them. Hence, when the time passes, inasmuch as they did not create new memories, their relation will unconsciously narrow down to a simple relation meaning that whether they want or not, they cannot be happy as much as the past.
To sum up, with all taken into account, I do believe that having the spirit of making new friends is of great importance for people being happy. Two reasons have mentioned above which can be briefed as changing their ideologies as well as their distance closeness.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, in addition, in contrast, in fact, as well as, in some cases, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2169.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85234899329 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45572987762 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514541387025 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6064622012 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.157894737 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5263157895 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57894736842 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17823295833 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635124538543 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588083928148 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114309397083 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483153243913 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.