Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public.
Having correct news has always been a key principle to make a better decision for every single life. In this regard, choosing resources bringing us the newer and more accurate news is of great importance. Some people think that nowadays the media are less concerned about the accuracy of the news than in the past and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public. I, personally, fully subscribe the idea that incorrect information may cause individuals to make disservice decisions, yet I do believe that the media are forced to concern about the accuracy of the news because of manifold reasons. Two of which are the progression in the technology and keep or increasing the media's market share.
Without any shadow of doubt, it is crystal clear that technology has been such progressed recent years that cannot be compared with the past. Of which, the role of communication on the internet bed is of undeniable. If the media, each of them, give up their concern of accurate news and start to spread inaccurate ones, by using the internet, people will distinguish the errors of the very media. Therefore, the very media is condemned to be boycotted by people. In addition, the progression of technology is the results of increasing the number of knowledgeable individuals meaning that people analytical power has been increased. Increasing people analytical power let them to have a better viewpoint about problems making them hardly can be deceived. On the other hand, owing to the fact that people had a lesser or no connection with each other in the past, inaccurate news were more prone to be spreaded and as a result, rumor was more contiguous in the past than today. Consistent with this reality, the question that why people could have been easily become inculcated by those who wanted to control them can be answered.
Moreover, news channels has long come to a conclusion that broadcasting inaccurate news has nothing but taking their market share them have nothing in the competition field, so in order for them to keep or increase their market share, they should force themselves to broadcast accurate news. Besides, for having a broad spectrum of audiences, some of them have chosen a distinct way. They have divided their news into different topics in order to have the maximum number of audiences. This means that the media are thinking about different strategies to have more audiences in which spreading accurate news are its prerequisite. Unlike today, the media were much lesser in the past which caused that competition has no meaning for them. In fact, the only key problem seemed to be that if they wanted to spread inaccurate news, it would have a disservice effect on people's mind which caused stressful atmosphere for people.
To sum up, with all taken into account, I believe that the idea in which states that the media are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past is not correct. The progression of technology and increasing the media's market share are two reasons for this point of view which were mentioned above. Plus, I agree with the theory that inaccurate news may cause more problem to the public. Supports for the latter opinion in mentioned among the further one.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, in addition, in fact, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 52.1666666667 161% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2692.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 547.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92138939671 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83611736076 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61433630242 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460694698355 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 845.1 618.680645161 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3859573074 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.043478261 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7826086957 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82608695652 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325598201369 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107276021023 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138252519154 0.0737576698707 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237931710254 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11144453761 0.0645574589148 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.