Some people think that these days' students are more engaged political conditions than in the past, while others think otherwise. Do you agree or not? explain why.
No one can cast a shadow of a doubt on the fact that political conditions affect individual's life. In this regard, some people think that students' engagement with the political arguments is not more than the past. Others, as well as I, think otherwise and believe that students are getting more engaged political activities than before. Reasons for supporting this idea are manifold, however, two of which are stated in detail hereunder.
To begin with, students have understood that they are the ones that should create their future. This is, in fact, because political decisions will directly influence on students' lives, so, the majority of students as adults who will manage the future of their society care about decisions. Besides, these days' students, unlike before, have more potential to defend their right which is as a result of the increase in their knowledge about some legal rights. This means that they have understood that they would better to know their political circumstances in order to live a happy life. In contrast, in that students were boycotted by adults in the past—because they were ignored as members of a society that can talk about what they want—they could not participate in the political arguments.
Moreover, in comparison to the past, some external effects are caused students to care about political concepts. One effect is the innovation of the internet which has a major effect on increasing students' knowledge about everything and their society political situation in particular. The presence of Facebook, as well as Twitter, is so undeniable that no one can disregard their being motivators for some intellectual revolution. By using these media, political parties can be said that exploit students' minds in order to inculcate students in a way in which they want. As a consequence, students are motivated by these parties, so, they will engage political activities. The difference between social strata is another external effect which tends to provoke students emotion to follow the parties' that give them a better life. In the past, on the other hand, because students were expected to just study their lessons and their future work was in many cases determined by their fathers, the effect of external effects was not that sensible.
To sum up, with all taken into account, I do believe that students more follow the political news and are more engaged these topics than before as far as the age range of parties' adherents and a reduction of science growth is concerned. I hope one day parties do not take students for granted and by making logical decisions let students so that they study their lessons and become less engaged political situations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... In this regard, some people think that students engagement with the political arguments...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... which has a major effect on increasing students knowledge about everything and their so...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, moreover, so, well, in contrast, in fact, in particular, as a result, as well as, in many cases, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2267.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 444.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10585585586 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64598425006 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47972972973 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 717.3 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9550798962 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.944444444 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.45110844103 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268036475929 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102768328388 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966982846314 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194266463487 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823115094141 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.