Throughout history, in all civilized societies, human relationships has engendered copious controversies among people. One of the questions which is often raised regarding this issue is whether we sould forgive our old friends in case that they do somthing that we do not like or not. Although some people are of the opinion that we should not continue our frienship with these persons, I firmly believe that it is better to continue our relationship with those because of sevetral reasons. In what follows, I will explain the most outstanding reasons.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that old friens are the best friends; it should be taken into account that old friens know us better than any one else. In fact, if one faces a problem in his/her life, old friednds of him/her are the best persons who can help to address the one's problem. So, Breaking the relationship with such a friend is not logical, and can has bad consequenses for us. Just imagine, you encounter a problem , and you have no friend to talk about your problem with him/her; it make the sityation so hard for you that it is possible are not be able to handle the problem properly. Also, the condition will get worse especially when you cannot tell your problem to your family owning to some considerations.
In approching this issue, apart from the fact mentioned above, one refer to another subtle point meticulously that we should learn how to forgive someone especially our friend. In fact, forgiveness is one of the important characteristics everyone should possess. Also, everyone should remind himself that no one is perferct, and it is possible for every creature to make mistake. So, when we face a situation in which our friends do something that we do not like; it is better to talk with our friends and ask them why they do that thing, and try to forgive them.
Taking all aforementioed arguments into account, I prefer to forgive my old friend in view of the fact that old friends know us very well, and we can learn how to forgive someone we love.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ken into account that old friens know us better than any one else. In fact, if on...
^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...nt that old friens know us better than any one else. In fact, if one faces a problem i...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...h such a friend is not logical, and can has bad consequenses for us. Just imagine, ...
^^^
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s. Just imagine, you encounter a problem , and you have no friend to talk about yo...
^^
Line 3, column 512, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...alk about your problem with him/her; it make the sityation so hard for you that it i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 575, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ard for you that it is possible are not be able to handle the problem properly. Al...
^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n learn how to forgive someone we love.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, regarding, so, well, apart from, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75630252101 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64985912427 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521008403361 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.1805779658 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.285714286 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28283557572 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867331634214 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838025355968 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152163307471 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704613719659 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.