You have long been friends with someone. If they do something that you don’t like, should you still be friends with him or her?

It is obvious that having a friend plays an important role in everyone life. Undoubtedly a friend can have significant effects on people’s success or defeat in their lives. some people assert that if their friend make a mistake and cause them become upset, they should leave them and do not continue their friendships, however I strongly believe that in this conditions, people should be friends with their friend. In the following paragraphs, I will discuss my view using some reasons and examples.
I think it is possible that all humans make a mistake in their lives and also do tasks which others do not like. But, they should talk to people about their mistakes and try to forgive them because of their wrong actions. It causes them to think about their mistakes and avoid repeating it in the future. Therefore, it is better for individuals to learn to make an effort to protect their friendly relationships, and because of some unwanted behavior, they should not damage their friendships. For example, I have a good friend, and he did a task which caused me to become upset. When I talked to her about her behavior, he explained that she did not think her action annoyed me, and I forgave her.
Moreover, I believe that it has taken people a great deal of time to make a friend and become familiar with them. If they decide to abandon their friend just owing to the fact that they do something that they do not like, it is not a reasonable performance. They have been with each other in happy or sad situations and help each other. In order to find a new friend and know them, people should spend a lot of time on it. In addition, there is not any guarantee that new friend do not a task which will not make them annoyed and anxious.
To sum up, in my point of view, humans should learn to forgive their friends and respect their friendships because of their shared memories and experiences. They have spent a lot of time together and they should not break up with each other because of their mistakes.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...pos;s success or defeat in their lives. some people assert that if their friend make...
^^^^
Line 1, column 360, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ips, however I strongly believe that in this conditions, people should be friends wi...
^^^^
Line 2, column 699, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r action annoyed me, and I forgave her. Moreover, I believe that it has taken pe...
^^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: KNOW_NOW[4]
Message: Did you mean 'now'?
Suggestion: now
...ther. In order to find a new friend and know them, people should spend a lot of time...
^^^^
Line 4, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h each other because of their mistakes.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, i think, in addition, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5773480663 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46600927285 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477900552486 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.9 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4551870397 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4705882353 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2941176471 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47058823529 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253142276904 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938941337833 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562737188163 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17926495535 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057917399246 0.0645574589148 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.