YOU PREFER TO BE A LEADER OR A MEMBER OF A TEAM?
Team work is one of the most important skills we all need to have. But in team work, we must pay attention to this issue that each person based on his personality type prefer to have a different role in the group. Some people like to lead the group, while, others prefer to be a member of the group and do the things which leader ask them. In my view, I am the type of person who prefer to be a leader. Here is two of my reasons for holding this idea.
First, I have lots of experience as being a leader. When I think about my past, I had team work since I was in elementary school. We had to create groups and do all our projects together. Maybe because I was the person who could talk better and also I was really good in my courses my teammates prefer to choose me as the leader. I never put any pressure on my teammates to select me as leader of the group. It was all their own decision. They were always saying that you are the best person who can be the leader. However, these team works were not that much important, all we need to do was just a simple task. But, they could help me to gain some precious experiences as being a leader. when I get older and started my high school, I decided to be the leader of the groups which I am in them. Being a leader is something that most of the people scare of it. But, I really like to be the person who manages everything. So, based on my experiences of being a leader, I prefer to be the leader of my team. In my view, for being a good leader, you must know how to manage members and control the pressure of the project. I am the person who has done it a lot before, so I can and like to be the leader.
Second, my personality type is more near to a leader rather than a member. Based on my interest in team work, I have read so many books in this regard. I am completely aware that being a leader does not mean that you are a special person. Leadership must not make you apart of the team, and you should not think that you are better than others. In my eyes, the leader is exactly like other members of the group and this role does not have any advantage compare to other roles of the team. But, I like to be the person who leads the team. Why so, as all psychological tests I have done, my personality type is more near to a leader rather than a person who like to just obeys others.
To cut the long story short, all I want to say is that, no matter which position you have in a team. If you want to get the best possible result, all members of the team must be unanimous. No matter you are the leader or just a member, you must act by the book and obey the rules of the team. But, me personally prefer to be a leader. I think if I be the leader I can work better and be a more positive member for the group compare to the time when I am a member. I believe the only thing which is important in team work, is having a deep connection with other members and help the team to achieve its goal in the best possible way. One person can help the team by doing things which leader says, the other one can help the team by leading it. I am the second one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 691, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...precious experiences as being a leader. when I get older and started my high school,...
^^^^
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: APART_A_PART[2]
Message: Wrong collocation. Did you mean 'apart from'?
Suggestion: apart from
...al person. Leadership must not make you apart of the team, and you should not think that...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, really, second, so, while, i think, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 38.0 15.1003584229 252% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 83.0 43.0788530466 193% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2494.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 626.0 407.700716846 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 3.98402555911 4.8611393121 82% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.00199880112 4.48103885553 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.13174230285 2.67179642975 80% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.362619808307 0.524837075471 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 792.0 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 25.0 9.59856630824 260% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 35.0 20.6003584229 170% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0934146971 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.2571428571 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8857142857 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.34285714286 5.45110844103 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.520167718887 0.236089414692 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160126389338 0.076458572812 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110488182872 0.0737576698707 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.38542918291 0.150856017488 255% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892903067181 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.3 11.7677419355 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 58.1214874552 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 5.51 10.9000537634 51% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 5.97 8.01818996416 74% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 10.247311828 59% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.