Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.
Young people, an important part of society, have been valued and trigger heated discussions over whether adolescents today have an influence on the important decisions regarding the future of society. The youth, in some people's perspective, are not able to participate in this decision-making process. On contrary, my perspective is that teenagers nowadays can have influence on the decision that determines future society due to the development of technology.
To begin with, never should we ignore that teenagers in contemporary times have knowledge about society, and thus possess the ability to make the right judgment on the future of society. With the compulsory education policy in most countries, children nowadays have free access to a wide range of expertise, disregarding their financial background. As a result, not only can they learn fundamental proficiency such as economy and policy, but also they can be exposed to pressing issues like environmental protection, economic depression, and unemployment. With such knowledge and eyesight, they are competent to apply the knowledge they have learned to pragmatic problems. For example, when analyzing the solutions to air pollution, students may come up with the idea that the governments can increase taxes on the companies that emits excessive exhaust, and simultaneously provide subsidy to the corporations that attach more significance to environmental reservations. However, in the past, it is arduous for these teenagers to obtain such knowledge and realize practical issues. Therefore, teenagers nowadays are more likely to make the right decision to transform society.
Apart from the knowledge current students could have, young people also have more approaches to express their idea and then influence the decisions that determine the future of the whole society. With the advent of the internet, young people can communicate on plenty of social websites, influencing the decision of the government indirectly. To be more specific, social websites such as Twitter and other forums, serve as a platform for young people to meet with others who have similar thoughts. They are able to stay together and criticize wrong regulations or laws enacted by the authority. For instance, in order to show their opinion about inappropriate regulation, young people can stay together and criticize the government. Such enormous voices on the internet, undoubtedly, will form huge pressure on the governors, forcing them to reconsider their decision. In contrast, teenagers will find it laborious to organize people together to express their opinion toward the decisions made by adults.
In conclusion, teenagers today definitely have an influence on the decisions about the future of society because they can acquire the necessary knowledge and express their opinion effortlessly today.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'discussions'' or 'discussion's'?
Suggestion: discussions'; discussion's
...ty, have been valued and trigger heated discussions over whether adolescents today have an ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...e future of society. The youth, in some peoples perspective, are not able to participat...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2424.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59815242494 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0059118555 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524249422633 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 770.4 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5776296128 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.666666667 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0555555556 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38888888889 5.45110844103 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352628238551 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109004514024 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11674270372 0.0737576698707 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25891749209 0.150856017488 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137305703903 0.0645574589148 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 58.1214874552 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 10.9000537634 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 86.8835125448 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.