1
The readig mentions strategies which biologists have suggested to preserve tortoise from extinction. The lecturer, on the other hand, rejects notions proposed by scholars and finds them dubious.
First, the passage states that it would be an advantageous strategy to designate a pine forest. The professor, conversely, states that it would not be practical. He states that, he is unsure that the tortoise would be provided by enough grass to feed on. In fact, the suggested areas are prone to periodic fires that would annihilate the grassland.
Second, the letter proposes to artificially breed tortoise in laboratory. The lecturer, in contrast, finds this idea impossible, too. He mentions the propobilty of disease that would be hard or impossible to be treatend. Furthermore, sick tortoise may infect other healthy tortoises.
Finally, the reading proposes to reintroduce tortoise to the areas which contain no tortoise and are suitble area for turtoises. The professor, however, believes that the tortoise is a kind of home-extinct specy, which tend to live only in their original habitat. Thus, moving them to new unknown habitat, would cause the tortoise to reject the new area and try to leave there. Moreover, it would be a pottential hazard for them because they should pass across crowded roads and increase the probability of their crsh with cars.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggested preserving'.
Suggestion: suggested preserving
...ntions strategies which biologists have suggested to preserve tortoise from extinction. The lecturer,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to leave there. Moreover, it would be a pottential hazard for them because they ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, thus, in contrast, in fact, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 217.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31797235023 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7849661473 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603686635945 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6565456984 49.2860985944 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.4285714286 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.