In 1822, at the age of 25, Austrian composer Franz Schubert began to work on a symphony in B Minor, his 8th Symphony.
In the lecture, the professor talked about Schubert’s 8th Symphony. Disputing the arguments in the passage that this work was complete, he cited several pieces of evidence showing that the musician considered his work not finished.
First, the professor said that Shubert lived at the end of the classical era, and it is more likely for him to follow the tradition of four movements. He stated that although there were precedents such as Beethoven having writing only two movements, and Schubert was fond of pushing the boundary in music, following the heritage of classical era is a more possible choice for the musician. This contradicts with the passage’s claim that Schubert was being innovative by writing only two movements.
Second, he said that there are evidence indicating that Schubert had indeed written the third and the fourth movements. While it is true that writing three movements with the same meters in a row was unusual during that time as the passage suggested, historians have found the track of the remaining movements. The remnants include an early piano version of the third movement written in three meters and a draft of the fourth movement being torn apart.
Third, the professor dismissed the passage’s claim that since the symphony with two movements sounded flawless, Schubert considered it complete. Instead, the professor stated that just because the first two movements were in such a wonderful state that Schubert was having difficulty completing the remaining parts of the symphony.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the lecture, the professor talked abo...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cian considered his work not finished. First, the professor said that Shubert l...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ovative by writing only two movements. Second, he said that there are evidence ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the fourth movement being torn apart. Third, the professor dismissed the passa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, third, while, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24489795918 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65650012603 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534693877551 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8080349937 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0985353390344 0.272083759551 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453976860702 0.0996497079465 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379764047202 0.0662205650399 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0683737181009 0.162205337803 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449050958608 0.0443174109184 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.