The reading and the lecture are both about a mysterious book called Voynich manuscript which was written on vellum and found around sixteen century. More specifically, in regard to the passage, the writer presents three theories about who wrote this book. The lecturer disputes the claims made in the article. His position is that none of the people how stated by the author did wrote the book.
First and foremost, the author of the reading states this book has some sientific or magial topics. The article mentions that Ascham maybe the author because there is a resemblance between the plants in this book and Ascham's book. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that Ascham was a physician but, his works in his book were not from his original ideas. Additionally, he points out that his book Herbal was known for the sources from the other books or writers, so from this knowledge he is not the writer.
Secondly, the author suggests the texts in the book are without benifet and it may refrenced to Kelley who took money from luxcury people by present some magical power. In the article it is said that Kelley made this book to sell it to people without ordering text to make unconscious about its meanings. Again, the speaker specifically addresses this point when he states people in the sixteen century were not so smart to make this effort to sell the book for them. He goes on to say that he can make a simple manuscript and sell it.
Finally, the author brings his argument to a close by suggesting that Voynich the man how sell the books is the author of the book, because of his experience in this field he can easly imitate any book and sell it. Not surprisingly, the professor takes issue with this claim by conteneding that from ink and volen it seems the book was written before 1400 years. He notes that if Voynich made the book he can take pages from other books, but he can not fake the ink on the manscript, Also the book written centuries brfore Voynich found it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...tten on vellum and found around sixteen century. More specifically, in regard to the pa...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 380, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'write'
Suggestion: write
...the people how stated by the author did wrote the book. First and foremost, the auth...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 22.412803532 201% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 358.0 270.72406181 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60893854749 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31633478204 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474860335196 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.9 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2668888083 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.125 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159780491343 0.272083759551 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588702319394 0.0996497079465 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571706422264 0.0662205650399 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110184794715 0.162205337803 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399841847478 0.0443174109184 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.