The reading passage describes the three protection methods of Torreya. The professor in
the lecture claimed that three ways are not effective with detail explanations.
To begin with, the professor refuses the replanting Torreya is not benefit. The same area where these plants has grown are in worse climate change and global warming cause that place drier and lack of ability for survive. That contradicts the passage in which that plants can grow under the same location owing to the microclimate which is wetter.
Secondly, if the pants are relocated to the north, the native Black lotus twill disperse fast and harmful to Torreya. Therefore, the professor disputes the author second opinion. In which, the migration of Torreya will success due to the cool temperature and more suitable place.
Besides, the capability of scientific research is not develop efficiently to protect the Torreya in their center for a long time. For these factors, tree population can be affected by the diseases and genetic diversion for a long time. That factors, challenge the writer who describe Torreya can monitored in the research center for get better result.
To sum up, the professor clearly decline that three ways to prevent Torreya mentioned in the reading passage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ith detail explanations. To begin with, the professor refuses the replanting Tor...
^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts the passage in which that plants can grow under the same location owing to th...
^^
Line 4, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the north, the native Black lotus twill disperse fast and harmful to Torreya. Th...
^^
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...enge the writer who describe Torreya can monitored in the research center for get...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 204.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21568627451 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55175192926 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593137254902 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.3177747063 49.2860985944 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.6666666667 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11103859849 0.272083759551 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425364968583 0.0996497079465 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313172047071 0.0662205650399 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0556451864581 0.162205337803 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290038667088 0.0443174109184 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.