24
In the reading passage, it talks about the fossils related to animal tissues, however, the professor holds different ideas.
To begin with, in the reading material, we learn that the lots of tiny branching channels are found inside of the leg bone fossil. The reading material argues that soft tissue is expected to be found in the channels. However, the professor thinks that the channels are more likely to be left by bacteria.
In addition, in the reading passage, it talks about that spheres are found in inner bone and red blood cells can remain. And in the reading passage, it gives evidence that the sphere has red centers. However, the professor indicates that there is no evidence show that creature at that time had red cells and the red centers should be something else.
As a final point, in the reading passage, it talks about that collagen is found on the leg bone. Collagen is actually a biochemical material, which is expected to be an association with bone tissue.
However, the professor says that collagen is not likely to live as long as 7 million years. It may be some recent material. For the instant, it may be from the hand skin of the researchers.
In conclusion, the professor does not agree with the reading passage.
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.260162601626 0.261695866417 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.166666666667 0.158904122519 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0528455284553 0.0723426182421 73% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0447154471545 0.0435111971325 103% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0284552845528 0.0277247811725 103% => OK
Prepositions: 0.130081300813 0.128828473217 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0406504065041 0.0370669169778 110% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.46889374042 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0243902439024 0.0208969081088 117% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.126016260163 0.128158765124 98% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0162601626016 0.0158828679856 102% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00813008130081 0.0114777025283 71% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1243.0 1645.83664459 76% => OK
No of words: 217.0 271.125827815 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72811059908 6.08160592843 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.04852973271 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.327188940092 0.374372842146 87% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.267281105991 0.287516216867 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.198156682028 0.187439937562 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0875576036866 0.113142543107 77% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46889374042 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 145.348785872 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502304147465 0.539623497131 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 44.6711405594 53.8517498576 83% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.6923076923 21.7502111507 77% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1671870017 49.3711431718 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6153846154 132.220823453 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6923076923 21.7502111507 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.615384615385 0.878197800319 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 43.4204182914 50.5018328374 86% => OK
Elegance: 1.79661016949 1.90840788429 94% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.193091322736 0.142949733639 135% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.103406904806 0.0787303798458 131% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.717600800612 0.631733273073 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.156320357519 0.139662658121 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.317932426861 0.414875509568 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0517038740604 0.0530846634433 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.26048565121 211% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 0.0 3.49668874172 0% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 3.1766004415 220% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Not in a correct format.
The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%) but more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.