Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.
As some people may hold the view that broadens family structure is a fundamental requirement of life in any era; however, others may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that this structure and links are not as vital as the past. I personally agree with the second belief. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons which persuade me to put forward this perspective.
The first reason which gives adherence to my outlook is that today's hectic lifestyle does not allow communicating. It is lucidly obvious that in the modern life pattern, the people are in a rush, they just are able to be accountable for their daily duties. This compacted schedule does not present the sufficient period for the family meeting. By considering this condition, it is logically explicit that the family members and the relationships do not have the previous definition as they have in a couple decades ago. As a result, by the missing of this interpretation, the new generation does not connect to their family members as in the past, and the broader family are meaningless among them.
The second case embraced my idea is that the wide range of social network communities does decline the actual social interactions. While there is an easy access to the network and various types of social communication on the internet, the people prefer to use that kind of interaction instead of social, face to face communication. Consequently, people external social networks are restricted to the internet messages. Based on the noteworthy intelligent survey conducted by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), approximately sixty-nine percent of the individual's interactions occur on the internet. Hence, for an unsocial person, it is a bizarre task to have the previous relationships with their family members.
The last indicator of my viewpoint's accuracy is that there is an alteration in the family structures. Nowadays, there is a trend of a sole kid or even no kid between the couples. In this scenario, if a couple has a kid, that child will get used to his or her loneliness. Moreover, it is a difficult condition for that kid to face a crowded environment. Thus, his or her individual realm is defined by limited and few interaction with his or her parents. A vivid example can be given to shed a light on the issue, is my nephew's example. He is a sole child in his family; whenever he and his family participate in the social activities such as the family party, it is a difficult condition for him to handle that crowd, and mostly he yells and requires his peace and quiet environment.
To wrap it up, based on the all aforementioned reasons, one can logically draw the conclusion that the extended family does not have the same value as it has in the past. Since the people in the modern life possess the hectic schedule with the lack of duration for the family meeting. Besides, the broader internet social networks are shortened the real social interactions, and the novel trend among the family, intolerances the kids for the populated surrounding.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'easy access'.
Suggestion: easy access
...ual social interactions. While there is an easy access to the network and various types of soc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 414, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun interaction seems to be countable; consider using: 'few interactions'.
Suggestion: few interactions
...ividual realm is defined by limited and few interaction with his or her parents. A vivid exampl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'consequently', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'kind of', 'such as', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.23951048951 0.229887763892 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.129370629371 0.158761421928 81% => OK
Adjectives: 0.104895104895 0.0866891130778 121% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0402097902098 0.046263068375 87% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0576923076923 0.0685040099705 84% => OK
Prepositions: 0.115384615385 0.118717715034 97% => OK
Participles: 0.0174825174825 0.0351676179071 50% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.95058852318 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0244755244755 0.0309702414327 79% => OK
Particles: 0.00174825174825 0.00188951952338 93% => OK
Determiners: 0.146853146853 0.0887237588012 166% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0104895104895 0.0209618222197 50% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0034965034965 0.0139019557991 25% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3088.0 2387.08602151 129% => OK
No of words: 520.0 408.028673835 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93846153846 5.86048508987 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.48200974243 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.348076923077 0.338922669872 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.261538461538 0.251872472559 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.194230769231 0.174417080927 111% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.136538461538 0.112833075102 121% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95058852318 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490384615385 0.524397521467 94% => OK
Word variations: 57.9574173399 59.2087087015 98% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6684587814 111% => OK
Sentence length: 22.6086956522 20.5533526081 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9199202419 48.84282405 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.260869565 120.699889404 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6086956522 20.5533526081 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.695652173913 0.644075263715 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 48.762541806 45.7405998639 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.63846153846 1.45489161554 113% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437349362777 0.300154397459 146% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.115829014601 0.103427244359 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0794923372379 0.0752933317313 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.561077412987 0.497263757937 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.167126868195 0.151897553556 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186522406599 0.114077575197 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847099096753 0.0781384742642 108% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.397987255565 0.336927656856 118% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0696255349444 0.067059652881 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.316363146589 0.210909579961 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619689335626 0.0618886996521 100% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8870967742 59% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.86379928315 259% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 8.42114695341 71% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 2.4623655914 284% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.75985663082 181% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.6433691756 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.