Some people agree that face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication yet others do not. Although I agree that face-to-face communication is better in some aspects, it depends heavily on the situation. I believe that each form of communication should be used in different circumstances.
To begin with, face-to-face interaction brings a way to effectively communicate with others. Talking to someone in person, we can see their attitude, facial expressions, gestures, tone of voice and body language. Based on these expressions, we can know the person’s actual feeling on your speech, or whether they are lying or not. Also, a 5-minute conversation can be as effective as 40 to 50 back and forth emails. That is why important meetings usually are face-to-face meetings. Talking directly to someone can innovate thinking and also enhance your creativity.
Secondly, face-to-face communication might be useful in certain cases, it is not as convenient as modern means of communication. For instance, if someone is far from the person they want to talk to, emails, messages or calls are the alternatives. Even though these forms of communications lack of body language and expressions, they are way faster than face-to-face. In some cases, they are even more efficient and convenient.
Lastly, email is also convenient for students to exchange information about their project or for people who want to do business with people in other countries. Instead of scheduling a meeting, which is hard nowadays since everyone is busy, people can just do it online with modern technology.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that face-to-face communication and other types of communications should be used depending on the situations to maximize the effectiveness of communicating.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 279.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48387096774 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36965984471 2.5805825403 131% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566308243728 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2809323556 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.625 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4375 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312048430816 0.272083759551 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111392208815 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108002888115 0.0662205650399 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189771304058 0.162205337803 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0902906320042 0.0443174109184 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.