Some people agree that face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication yet others do not. While it may seem obvious that face-to-face interaction outweighs other forms of communication, it still depends on which situation that one type is more preferable than the other.
Face-to-face interaction enables us to communicate effectively with one another. Talking to someone in person, we can see their attitude, facial expressions, gestures, tone of voice and body language. Based on these expressions, we can know the person’s actual feeling on your speech, and, perhaps, whether they are lying or not. Also, a 5-minute conversation can be as effective as 40 to 50 back-and-forth emails, which is why important meetings are usually face-to-face meetings. Talking directly to someone can innovate new ideas thinking and also enhance your creativity.
Secondly, even though face-to-face communication might be useful in certain cases, it is not as convenient as modern means of communication. For instance, if someone is far from the person they want to talk to, he or she might resort to emails, messages or calls as the alternatives. Even though these forms of communications lack of body language and expressions, they are way faster than face-to-face. In some cases, they are even more efficient and convenient.
Lastly, email is also convenient for students to exchange information about their project or for people who want to do business with people in other countries. Instead of scheduling a meeting, which is hard nowadays since everyone is busy, people can just do it online with modern technology.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that face-to-face communication and other types of communications should be used depending on the situations to maximize the effectiveness of communicating.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t resort to emails, messages or calls as the alternatives. Even though these form...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52650176678 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32754891065 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586572438163 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7374995869 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.714285714 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0607361682149 0.244688304435 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0250383995408 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281615516539 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0414280450051 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201608623606 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.