advantages and disadvantages of using smart cars
The text discusses the advantages of using smart cars and by providing some information, explains why it holds such a notion. On the other hand, the professor goes against all the stated claims and by mentioning some contradictory explanations, states why she is against the author.
First, the text states that smart cars can prevent a noticeable number of accidents and save lives by this means. In contrast, the professor explains that even highly smart cars can get into accidents as well as humans. She also states that new technologies provide driving in more tight and compact situations which leads to more accidents. In this way, she explains why smart cars cannot save lives as the author claimed.
Second, as the text, smart cars by moving in faster speeds can decline traffic problems. The professor refutes this claim and explains that the history has shown that in more convenient driving conditions, people tend to drive more. As a result, increased number of the cars in high ways can create even more traffic, and they cannot take advantage of high speed driving.
Third, the author mentions that the items of smart cars last longer. It also mentions that these cars need less repair which means costing less for their owners. The professor casts doubt on this point. She claims that smart cars need lots of highly advanced tools to detect the location and destination of the other cars which will cost a lot. Besides that, sensors of these cars are too expensive which make even more expenses for their owners. We can also hear from her that when these cars need to be repaired, its cost will be more than normal cars. In this way she explains why smart cars do not decrease the total costs of driving.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, second, so, third, well, in contrast, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82491582492 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31683107781 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8451733954 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5625 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5625 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282498967442 0.272083759551 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108444605409 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888971207385 0.0662205650399 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175539254121 0.162205337803 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216263070529 0.0443174109184 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.