higher taxes on unhealthy behaviors
The text discusses the increase of taxes on unhealthy foods and explains how it can help the whole society at the end. On the other hand, the Professor goes against stated points and by providing some contradictory information, explains why she believes all stated points are challenging.
First, the author states that higher taxes on the unhealthy foods encourage people to buy and use them less. It also mentions that as a result of increase in the tobacco' taxes, people used them less, and this can happen for unhealthy foods as well. In contrast, the professor mentions that we cannot assure that higher taxes on unhealthy foods lead people to follow healthy diets. She continues that by increase in the taxes of these foods, people buy cheaper foods with lower quality which have even more negative effects on their health.
Second, the text claims that higher taxes on unhealthy behaviors are fair. As an explanation, it states that government by obtaining more money from increased taxes can cover medical cost, and it can benefit the society. On the other hand, the professor explains that this kind of income is really arguable among people. She refutes this point the second point made by author, and states that higher prices on unhealthy foods put more pressure on the lower class of the society. She continues that government should pay attention to the income of different types of people and In this way, she explains why she disagree with the author.
Third, as the text, high taxes of cigarettes can strengthen government's revenue. It also include that government by having higher income, can do projects which all the people can benefit of it. The professor goes against this claim and explains that this income can have its own down sides. We can also hear from her that this high income can make the government depend on it. She also mentions that some times, because the government do not want to lose this income, may not take proper actions against unhealthy habits like smoking in open and public areas like parks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-28 | neha_1217 | 80 | view |
| 2019-02-06 | Steven Huang | 71 | view |
| 2018-08-30 | nastaran1992 | 68 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 577, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... income of different types of people and In this way, she explains why she disagr...
^^
Line 5, column 613, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'disagrees'.
Suggestion: disagrees
... and In this way, she explains why she disagree with the author. Third, as the text,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'includes'?
Suggestion: includes
...strengthen governments revenue. It also include that government by having higher incom...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t also include that government by having higher income, can do projects which all...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, really, second, so, then, third, well, in contrast, kind of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 22.412803532 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 347.0 270.72406181 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90489913545 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3382327036 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472622478386 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 511.2 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0825628988 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.375 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6875 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257790427597 0.272083759551 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113372965632 0.0996497079465 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147576185523 0.0662205650399 223% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163932798945 0.162205337803 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787779565575 0.0443174109184 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.