agnostids
The listening lecture totally opposes to the reading passage in how agnostids may have live. To begin with, the reading says that agnostids may have been free-swimming predators that hunted smaller animals. However, the listening argues that this is not likely to be true. All of the free-swimming predators need to have a well develop eyes so they can see their pray. However, agnostids have poor eyes, and sometimes, they are even blind. Moreover, if they are the predators, they must have some other special feature to help them pray on smaller animals, but there is no evidence that can explain this idea. Therefore, since agnostids have poor eyes and they do not have other special features, it is not true that they are free-swimming predator that hunted smaller animals.
In addition, the reading indicates that agnostids may have dwelled on the seafloor. On the other hand, the listening asserts that seafloor dwellers usually move very slow and occupy a small area without moving to other places. However, there are evidences shows that agnostids occupy in multiple areas and spread large distances. In other words, since agnostids occupy in many different places, they are not likely to be seafloor dwellers.
Last but not least, the reading suggests that agnostids were parasites that live and feed off larger organisms. However, the listening implies that this idea is incorrect. As we know, parasite's population need to be limited, otherwise they will kill to many organisms and lead them to extinction. However, researchers had found evidence of agnostids fossils shows that agnostids live in a large group. Therefore, the large number of agnostids population seem to rule out the theory that they are parasites.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...ues that this is not likely to be true. All of the free-swimming predators need to have a ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... other words, since agnostids occupy in many different places, they are not likely to be seafl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, in addition, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16725978648 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57526365206 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508896797153 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.0 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0628772613 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.75 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330069771664 0.272083759551 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145944560033 0.0996497079465 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124417964395 0.0662205650399 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256595431708 0.162205337803 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593838524559 0.0443174109184 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.