Do you agree or disagree with the following statement. The government should provide people with the free internet access.
In modern day life, internet is very important for people. For students, they use internet to study or finish their school papers. For businessmen, they use internet to connect with their customers and earn money. Even elderly people use internet, they use it for checking news or weather online. Some people may claim that the government should provide free internet access for people to use. However, I disagree with this statement for several reasons.
First of all, internet can cause problems to students. To be more specific, it is true that students will use internet for studies. However, most students will spend most of their time watching movies online or paling games. For example, when I was in elementary school, I have a friend who always got A+ in every single class. At that time, none of us have internet access, so he always spend about 7 hours to study everyday. However, when we went to high school, my friend had a smart phone with internet access. Therefore, he only spend about 2 hours to study, because he is addictive to some online games, and as time pass, his grade is not as good as before. Thus, free internet access can affect students studying habit. Indeed, the government should not provide free internet access.
In addition, internet can also cause negative affect on people. Using internet require looking at the screen and sitting for a long time, and this will definitely cause some health problem to people. For example, my uncle likes to play online games during his free time and sometimes he can sit and play games for about 5 hours. As time pass, there are some health problems start to appear. The first one is near sighting, he can not see anything without his glasses which is terrible. The worst problem is, he had some issue about his backbones because he always sit for a long time without moving. As a result, he did some surgeries which is not only painful, but also cost a lot of money. Thus, internet is actually harmful for people health. To say it differently, if internet is destructive for people to use, why should government provide free internet access for people?
Undoubtedly, some people may say that the government should provide free internet for people, because internet can be very convenient and if the government provide free internet, these resident can save lots of money since they do not need to buy the access by themselves. However, internet is not good for people when they rely on too much. As a result, people will not use technologies when they do not have internet access. Indeed, the government should definitely not provide people free internet access.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 389, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'spends'.
Suggestion: spends
...f us have internet access, so he always spend about 7 hours to study everyday. Howeve...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 418, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... he always spend about 7 hours to study everyday. However, when we went to high school, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 535, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'spends'.
Suggestion: spends
...ith internet access. Therefore, he only spend about 2 hours to study, because he is a...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ition, internet can also cause negative affect on people. Using internet require looking ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'sits'.
Suggestion: sits
...e about his backbones because he always sit for a long time without moving. As a re...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, as a result, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2186.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82560706402 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40999151466 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450331125828 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7371385355 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0714285714 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1785714286 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314169740434 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113520679258 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126911832768 0.0737576698707 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233449703953 0.150856017488 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0917318626407 0.0645574589148 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.002688172 45% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.