Airships
The writer claims in the reading passage that airships could become popular again because it has 3 advantages over airplanes and helicopters, but the professor argues in the lecture that these ideas are not convicing. Clearly, the hold different views of the same topic.
First, the author present a viewpoint that due to the air force that keeps the ship airbone, airship costs less fuel than the others and more economical. However, the lestening puts foward a different opinion that the air inside airships are almost hydrogen, which is dangerous, and helioum, which is expensive. Therefore, what the reading states is refuted by the professor.
Second, the reading states that airships can easily launch in hard-to-reach locations because it doesn't need a long runaway for takeoff and can carry heavey loads from forests. While the lesture argues that airship can only move slowly and safly load in forests because there are too many trees that may hurt it, and it can not keep steady in strong wind that would make damages, so the professors ideas disproves the reading.
Third, the reading claims that airships can replace satellites because they are able to rise high above the surface and stay without refueling for some time, which is similar to satellites, while the professor contends that they can only stay at about 40 km above the surface ahere has strong wind that require a lot of energy to keep steady, which means a large costs of fuel.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...h in hard-to-reach locations because it doesnt need a long runaway for takeoff and can...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 364, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'cost'?
Suggestion: cost
...rgy to keep steady, which means a large costs of fuel.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1219.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97551020408 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36701616268 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604081632653 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.6498847926 49.2860985944 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.375 110.228320801 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.625 21.698381199 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245972090397 0.272083759551 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107649692717 0.0996497079465 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667826620621 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154218058019 0.162205337803 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044709595335 0.0443174109184 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.3589403974 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 53.8541721854 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.