Airships
The writer claims in the reading passage that airships could become popular again because it has 3 advantages over airplanes and helicopters, but the professor argues in the lecture that these ideas are not convicing. Clearly, the hold different views of the same topic.
First, the author present a viewpoint that due to the air force that keeps the ship airbone, airship costs less fuel than the others and more economical. However, the lestening puts foward a different opinion that the air inside airships are almost hydrogen, which is dangerous, and helioum, which is expensive. Therefore, what the reading states is refuted by the professor.
Second, the reading states that airships can easily launch in hard-to-reach locations because it doesn't need a long runaway for takeoff and can carry heavey loads from forests. While the lesture argues that airship can only move slowly and safly load in forests because there are too many trees that may hurt it, and it can not keep steady in strong wind that would make damages, so the professors ideas disproves the reading.
Third, the reading claims that airships can replace satellites because they are able to rise high above the surface and stay without refueling for some time, which is similar to satellites, while the professor contends that they can only stay at about 40 km above the surface ahere has strong wind that require a lot of energy to keep steady, which means a large costs of fuel.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...h in hard-to-reach locations because it doesnt need a long runaway for takeoff and can...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 364, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'cost'?
Suggestion: cost
...rgy to keep steady, which means a large costs of fuel.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 52.1666666667 42% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 8.0752688172 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1219.0 1977.66487455 62% => OK
No of words: 245.0 407.700716846 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97551020408 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36701616268 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604081632653 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 618.680645161 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.6003584229 39% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.6498847926 48.9658058833 199% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.375 100.406767564 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.625 20.6045352989 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245972090397 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107649692717 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667826620621 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154218058019 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044709595335 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 11.7677419355 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.