Some people believe that smaler coleges and universities provide students with a better educational experience by , for example , offering more individual attention to each student . Other people believe that larger coleges and universities provide a better educational experience . Which view do you agree with and why ? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer .
Over the past few years, the issue whether taking courses taught by professors with whom have already taught before or not has kindled heated debate amoung people. Depending on different personal experience, we find that a number of people hold the idea that teachers who are familiar could offer more comfortable teaching experience than who are not so familiar with. However, given the chance, I tend to support the statement that professors whose classes I have never taken are much better, because I can learn more from them and build relationships with different teachers.
To begin with, as a student, I can learn more from different professors about a same topic, let alone different ideas and topics they taught. When attending a class, students can learn not only knowledges of major subject but also other kinds of knowledges such as methods of leaning and viewpoints about majors, and the benefits of which will be extended by contacting with different professors. Take myself; as an example: when I was a freshman in college, the courses about mathematics, which contains advanced mathematics, liner algebra and probabilities, were taught by a single professor whose methods of teaching were not be accepted by me. Because of this, my grads are not so good in the first semester. Fortunately, these courses were taken over by three professors in the next semester, and I really enjoyed the different sparks in brainstorms, which taught me a lot about the methods of solving technical problems.
In addition, students can build a good relationship in working with their teachers, who are in the leading position of the area that they taught. And some of the teachers are leaders in big companies, which will help students get positions and better understand their whole career life. One of my professor once told me that people should learn more about the real illustration of their career and have good relationship with people who are helpful before they graduate and find their jobs. And after I went to work in a financial company, I totally agree what he said. I started to find that I am not son interested in this job, and that’s because I had nobody to talk with when I was in college, where was full of talents that did well in computer science but not in finance.
Therefore, according to all the reasons listed above, we can draw the conclusion that the more professors we met on the area we learn, the better our career life will be. As a result, I prefer to be taught by professors who have not taught me before.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 907, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ht me a lot about the methods of solving technical problems. In addition, stud...
^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ition of the area that they taught. And some of the teachers are leaders in big companies, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, really, so, therefore, well, in addition, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 25.0 11.0286738351 227% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2113.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85747126437 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65373798144 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514942528736 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 640.8 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.2784885032 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.866666667 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 20.6045352989 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116156774174 0.236089414692 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414017676737 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375025202707 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0744543645522 0.150856017488 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331312639326 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 58.1214874552 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.