argument if the dinosaurs is endotherm or not.
The lecture and the reading passage both talk about the endotherms property in animals, which helps them to keep their body temperature constant like a human. The reading passage says that dinosaurs are endotherms animals. While the lecture refutes that idea by providing many reasons with evidence.
First of all, the reading claims that the dinosaurs endotherms because they lived in the polar regions as the fossil showed, the weather there is cold so they need this feature to keeps them alive. The lecturer refutes that by saying that the polar area was warmer than now so they can live, also in the cold weather they migrate to another warm region.
In addition, the reading gives another reason is that dinosaurs' legs underneath their bodies, so they can run and do physical activities, this reason supports that they endotherms as the other animals. The professor counters this by saying it is not necessary that those legs connected with the endotherms, he said that those legs help to support their large body weight.
Lastly, the reading claims that they have haversian bones allow them to grow rapidly, as proved in many animals it is evidence that they are endothermic. The lecturer refutes that by saying also it has growth ring bones that they sustain slaw growth of the dinosaur's body in cooler weather and then rapid and slow, this property of growth exist in a non-endotherms animal.
Those evidence by the professor refutes the reading passage and shows that dinosaurs are not Endotherms.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'endotherms'' or 'endotherm's'?
Suggestion: endotherms'; endotherm's
...the reading passage both talk about the endotherms property in animals, which helps them t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... that dinosaurs are endotherms animals. While the lecture refutes that idea by provid...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, lastly, so, then, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 22.412803532 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1260.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39522179089 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496031746032 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 381.6 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.050374624 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139000654801 0.272083759551 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753865452929 0.0996497079465 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785545178795 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0906137879339 0.162205337803 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237305614597 0.0443174109184 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.