the argument on the online edition of the encyclopedia. the reading claims that online edition has several drawbacks over traditional books.
The lecture and the reading both discuss whether or not an online communal encyclopedia significant than the printed ones. While the reading states that communal online encyclopedia has several problems than the traditional book, the lecture refutes this point, saying that no one encyclopedia is precisely accurate, the online encyclopedia has several advantages compared to traditional ones.
First of all, the reading claims that the authors aren't have considerable knowledge which leads to errors. However, the professor argues that no one book is comprehensive, but online books are easy to rectify the mistakes. Furthermore, the lecture states that e-books are easy to correct the errors compared to printed books. If the book once printed it takes a while to correct and reprint.
In addition, the passage makes an argument that online materials profound to be manipulated or remove the original content. The professor counters this point by saying online editions are improved protection from the hackers. According to the professor, online encyclopedia practicing read-only format and it will not allow one else to edit the original text. What is more, they are maintaining a team of editors to correct the online editions.
Lastly, the reading passage argues that online communal encyclopedia generates false impression to readers by focusing on repeated topics. The lecture refutes this claim by pointing out that traditional books have limited space but the online books have plenty of space. Moreover, the professor says online editions focus numerous academic topic with a large diversity in topic and specialization is not an issue with the online edition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...he lecture and the reading both discuss whether or not an online communal encyclopedia signifi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 51, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...ll, the reading claims that the authors arent have considerable knowledge which leads...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 439, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s not an issue with the online edition.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, moreover, so, while, in addition, first of all, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46718146718 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79681163198 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525096525097 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8467721949 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.923076923 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402636283638 0.272083759551 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133209441206 0.0996497079465 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806330239991 0.0662205650399 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241322510201 0.162205337803 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0878108117759 0.0443174109184 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.8541721854 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.