Asteroids are large space objects made of rock and ice. There are hundreds of thousands of asteroids in our solar system. Though we often hear ideas about establishing colonies of humans to live and work on our Moon or our neighboring planet, Mars, some think that sending people to an asteroid would actually be the best colonization option for a number of reasons Low Gravity To begin with, asteroids are often much smaller than planets, so they have lower gravity. When landing a spaceship, the craft would not be pulled as strongly or as forcefully toward the asteroid's surface, making the landing safer than landing on the Moon or Mars; it would also allow a spacecraft to carry much more equipment needed to set up the colony. It would also be easier for the spacecraft to take off again, so the spaceship would need to carry considerably less fuel for the trip back to Earth. Mining Valuable Metals Next some asteroids are rich in valuable elements and precious metals that are relatively rare on Earth, such as gold and platinum. An asteroid colony would be extremely profitable and a good source of these raw materials. The colonists or businesses sponsoring them could more than pay for the cost of their support by mining minerals and sending them back to Earth. Easy to Reach Finally, asteroids are a good option for colonization because some of them would be very easy to reach. There are a number of asteroids that periodically come within or near Earth's orbit Some of them actually get closer to Earth than our Moon. So these asteroids would be much easier and more affordable to get to and get back from than a planet like Mars, which would require a two-year trip in each direction.
The reading and the lecture are both about traits of colonization in an asteroid which tends them to figure out some advantages against disadvantages. The author of the reading believes that the asteroid would be the greatest replacement for human colonization. In contrast to that, the lecturer Hess doubt on claims made in the article. He thinks that It seems like real what we hear about it as it is not.
Initially, the author points out that lower gravity will be beneficial to us. It is also mentioned that aircraft could easily be landing and take off because of it. As a result, the cost of fuel will be decreased. Whereas the speaker challenges this point By saying that low gravity would be the cause of serious health issues, for instance, muscle and bone density loss.
After that, the originator contends about the finding of valuable material, causing a great profit for colony peoples. further, it is noted that the sponsor will get the chance to invest in colony people than they were at the beginning. Debates on this. He says the price depends on the availability of the product so the price of the metal comes from will drop rather than rise because of its abundance in. Besides, the cost of the metal would be high because of sponsoring the colony for This is high as well.
Finally, the author of the reading states that the path would be close to the earth where he forgets the fact according to the speaker that as they are not staying on the same side for always. As a result, the path distance will be determined to, For instance, the author mentioned that the astronauts who back from Mars to earth had to complete the more distance than the distance they covered to go from earth to the Mars.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Further
...sing a great profit for colony peoples. further, it is noted that the sponsor will get ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...ey are not staying on the same side for always. As a result, the path distance will be...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, so, well, whereas, for instance, in contrast, as a result, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6319218241 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4147377536 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534201954397 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3174209828 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.068223892714 0.272083759551 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0254704585382 0.0996497079465 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0318405373788 0.0662205650399 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.046023939788 0.162205337803 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549221020507 0.0443174109184 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 12.2367328918 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.