“Overall, the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today's world." Use reasons and details to support your opinion.
Since the dawn of humanity people used to be the most accurious seeker of the globe.When it comes in terms of data called "Internet" since its foundation in 1971 it enhances their speed enormously. Many men many minds, so there was a possibility that it could have both propositions excellent or bad. But in my point of view, the outcomes of internet uses is undoubtedly uncountable. I feel this way for two reasons, which I am going to explore in the following essay.
First of all, the Internet has the key to put the politicians in front of the world of transparent omitting the fear of darkness. Life is not a bed of roses, but after winning the election, most of the country presenter forget the critical factor that what the reason they are selected for. Henceforth, they misbehave with every little pigment of other lives which are very significant to them. My own experience is compelling with this. Recently an online magazine published a piece of news to revealing our local politicians. The report was so researched and well shaped. There was no way to deny the report but to accept. Through the internet, the news spread no fast all over the countries, which makes our Prime-Minister make an emergency meeting to warn her all the party leaders. In addition, it helps people to raise their voices through online as it is safer than ever.
On top of that, people are more motivated than ever to become politically active because they can freely exchange ideas online. In countries all over the globe, people use social networking services to share their ideas and opinions. While in the past people might have thought that they were alone in their beliefs, today they realize that others share their ideas. My own experience demonstrates this concept. When I was a university student, I learned that a municipal park near my apartment was going to be demolished to make room for a massive parking lot. This bothered me a lot because I enjoyed spending my free time in the park. At first, I thought that there was nothing that I, as an individual, could do to stop this from happening. However, I later joined a Facebook group dedicated to opposing the plan. When the members of the group learned how many people in the city loved the park we were happy to get together and enthusiastically protest in front of city hall until our voices were heard. I am convinced that finding each other on that social networking platform gave us the courage to actively protect our park.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that, life is full of ups and downs are known to all mostly but the true factor is to be considered that beyond all of that it has to have minimal significance so that we get the inspiration to continue our lead and internet plays as of the vital roles here. This is because online journalism strengthens our democracy and because social networking sites encourage people to be get involved in local politics.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Since the dawn of humanity people used to be ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: When
... the most accurious seeker of the globe.When it comes in terms of data called '...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, so, then, thus, well, while, as to, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2442.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 514.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75097276265 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76146701107 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72949918227 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536964980545 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 770.4 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4539316611 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.68 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.56 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102131455889 0.236089414692 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0249178465378 0.076458572812 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430799660118 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705873240837 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416845272005 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.