The auther state that, dinosaurs are endotherms and the lecturer claims that, dinosaurs are not the endotherms
The article and lecture both about the dinosaurs. The author state that, dinosaurs are endotherm and give three reasons to support this idea. However, the lecturer claims that, dinosaurs are not the endotherm and refutes the each point which are author made.
First of all, the reading implies that the dinosaurs fossils discovered in polar regions and only endotherm animals can live in cold place, that's why, dinosaurs are the endotherm. Although the lecturer explains that, in past polar region, may be, warmer than today and dinosaurs easily can live in warmer climate. He assumes that after the climate become colder of polar region then dinosaurs may be migrate to warmer region.
Second, the reading said that, legs of all modern endotherm are underneath the body and so were the legs of dinosaurs too. The lecturer oppose this point by saying that, dinosaurs has underneath leg because of large body.
Finally, the author expresses that, presence of Haversian canals in bone is a strong, indicator that the animal is an endotherm and fossilized bones of dinosaurs are usually dense with Haversian canals. Nevertheless, the lecturer suppose that, dinosaurs bones also have growth rings and that is causes of stop grow in cold region and grow faster in warmer region.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...author made. First of all, the reading implies that the dinosaurs fossils disco...
^^
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...dotherm animals can live in cold place, thats why, dinosaurs are the endotherm. Altho...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'opposes'.
Suggestion: opposes
...the legs of dinosaurs too. The lecturer oppose this point by saying that, dinosaurs ha...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, may, nevertheless, second, so, then, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 209.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12440191388 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35753624628 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55980861244 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6328511831 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.1 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.526113831492 0.272083759551 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.230739132867 0.0996497079465 232% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121129200327 0.0662205650399 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.341849759294 0.162205337803 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100494280634 0.0443174109184 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.