Automobile eco fuel discussion
Both the reading task and lecturer discuss about the automobile fuel source advantages and disadvantages. The reading passage hold the idea that fuel-cell engine is better that other types of engines, including internal combustion engine, hydrogen based cells and their cost differences. Moreover, lecturer has different opinion that the reading passage holds.
First, the reading passage states that internal-combustion engine based on only petolium with is finite source but vice verse the fuel-cell engines can be made from various types of sources such as water and natural gases. However, lecturer disagree with the statement that hyrdogen produced from water in unusable artificial substance which is complicated to derive.
Second, engine based population is truly harming environment. The passage believes that hydrogen-based fuel cell are polluting air by burning oil while fuel-cell engine are made from water which does not pollute air. In contrast the lecturer explain this statement that the process of making fuel-cell engine itself make plenty of pollution from the factory.
Last, passage states that fuel-cell engines are economically advantage because its cost. However, the lecturer quite dissimilar with the statement that fuel-cell engines are not cheap because it made by raw material platinium which is not rare. For this reason the cost will be increase with the scarcity of platinium.
In sum, the lecturer describe his opinion about fuel-cell engine that its not eco-friendly, economically save and easy to manufacture. He explain his opinion with above three statement with great examples.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...om water which does not pollute air. In contrast the lecturer explain this statement tha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'explains'.
Suggestion: explains
...ically save and easy to manufacture. He explain his opinion with above three statement ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e three statement with great examples.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, while, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65983606557 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76690948435 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561475409836 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.5062126115 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.230769231 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7692307692 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178416142953 0.272083759551 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679783580906 0.0996497079465 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835164560579 0.0662205650399 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985541994426 0.162205337803 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469152645408 0.0443174109184 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.8541721854 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.2367328918 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.