Because of climate change, more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry, unusable desert land. There are many proposals about how to stop this process, known as desertification. A number of proposals involve growing trees, because trees can help protect soil and provide many other benefits to fight against desertification. Some scientists have proposed that the best way to grow trees in dry areas in danger of desertification is by using a box-shaped device surrounding the young tree. The device collects water that condenses from vapor in the atmosphere and helps the tree to grow. However, other scientists believe that this device will not be successful in fighting against desertification for the following reasons.
Desertification is a phenonmenon which is attributed to the drying of land where it cannot be used for cultivation anymore. The reason for this phenomenon is climate change and scholars have proposed measurements to counter it. Planting trees in dry areas with the help of box-shaped devices that has the ability to accumalate vapor from atmosphere is a technique that has supporters and critics. The text proposes three reasons why it cannot be implemented effectively, while the professor opposes the text.
First, the boxes used for growing trees is not affordable right now. The price of each box is 25 dollars which is not affordable by most people who have been harmed by destertification. The professor casts doubt on this idea by saying that these boxes have the potential of being used for more than 20 times. Hence, according to him, they are more cost-effective than the text claims.
Second, the people who are effected by desertification do not generally have enough resources or time or are not willing to practice this activity on trees that do not provide food. According to the lecturer, not only can this process help people in acquiring food but also for other needs such as firewood. Accroding to him, people can use the branches on trees for fire or grow trees or vegetables that provide food.
Third, the text challenges the ability of this technology to maintain water. Although this device can help young trees to grow, when they are bigger this device can no longer help in their growth. However, the lecturer says that this device can help young trees to grow its roots and reach water-rich deep soils. He gives an example from Sahara desert where young trees have survived the harsh conditions even after 2 years of the box removal.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, third, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 299.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91638795987 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68304561924 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5699547213 49.2860985944 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.0 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20311814292 0.272083759551 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716917569919 0.0996497079465 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490925449838 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121845637339 0.162205337803 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431585355965 0.0443174109184 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.