The reading and the lecture are both about using a device called box-shaped to assist in growing trees in the aim of against desertification. More specifically, in regard to the passage, the writer presents three theories about the useless of this device. The lecturer disputes the claims made in the article. His position is that these clues are not persuasive.
First and foremost, the author of the reading states this operation of this device is cost 25 dollars which is a high cost. The article mentions that some countries have millions of trees and they can not provide this amount of money. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that this device can be reused to another trees when the tree become bigger. Additionally, he points out that by dividing the 25 dollars into the all trees that will use the device the cost will be reasonable.
Secondly, the author suggests it is required from the farmers to preserve and fix the device, but these farmers have other works to bring food to their families. In the article it is said that it is awkwardness ro stimulate those farmers. Again, the professor specifically addresses this point when he states using this device farmers can collect more water to other plants and if the government give the access for them they can use it in vegetables. He goes on to say that farmers can use the branches of the trees to use them as fire wood, so this can motivate the farmers.
Finally, the author brings his argument to a close by suggesting that the ability of the device to store water is limited. Not surprisingly, the lecturer takes issue with this claim by contending that the roots of the tree can reach to the underground to absorp water. He notes that in Sahara desert 90 percent of the trees still thriving after removig the device.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 214, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (ro) must be used with a third-person verb: 'stimulates'.
Suggestion: stimulates
...le it is said that it is awkwardness ro stimulate those farmers. Again, the professor spe...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 317.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72555205047 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52889834744 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507886435331 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6222048204 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.625 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 7.06452816374 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108759794457 0.272083759551 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363502947365 0.0996497079465 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341355309821 0.0662205650399 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0688452179893 0.162205337803 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296559853049 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.