Both reading and writing discuss about a solution toward prohibiting desertification which is using a small vehicle. The auther states some points against this solution while the professor disagrees, explaining why it can be an efficient way to stop desertification.
First, the reading states the cost of these vehicles are so high that some countries cannot afford it. In contrast, the speaker mentions that each vehicle can be used 20 times and there is no need to provide one for each tree. Therefore, the cost can be noticeably decreased.
Second, based on reading, for mentioned solution, local people have to look for these vehicle which is time consuming and local people may not accept this. On the other hand, the lecturer explains that there can be some benefits for local people that make an insentive for them. For example, people can use the water collected by these machinese for growing their vegetables. Another benefit is that by growing trees, people can use their branches for firewood. In this case, people will accept looking for trees.
Third, the reading asserts that these vehicles are so small that once a tree grows and become big, the machine cannot provide enough water for that tree and therefore this vehicles are useless. Again, the professor casts doubt on this view. The professor says that when a tree become big, its root grows and get deep into the ground. In this way, the tree can survive without help of the vehicle. The results of an experiment showed that 90 percent of trees which were using these vehicles still keeped driving 2 years after the vehicles were removed.
In conclusion we can see that although the reading passage points some drawbacks of this solution, the professor argues in favor of the mentioned solution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this vehicle' or 'these vehicles'?
Suggestion: this vehicle; these vehicles
...solution, local people have to look for these vehicle which is time consuming and local peopl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 168, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nough water for that tree and therefore this vehicles are useless. Again, the profes...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, may, second, so, still, therefore, third, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99663299663 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4467575851 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542087542088 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0634978114 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.75 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5625 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116666320881 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454143391624 0.0996497079465 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293406938052 0.0662205650399 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0613834511183 0.162205337803 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285386587304 0.0443174109184 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.