Both the reading passage and the lecture combine to give a complete understanding of the negative effects of social media.
Both the reading passage and the lecture combine to give a complete understanding of the negative effects of social media. To support this idea the author provides three cases that show definitely harmful consequences of using social media. The lecturer elaborates on statements made by the author and provides additional evidence.
The author begins by stating that the first negative effect is a false sense of connectivity among people. In the article, it is mentioned that communication and relationship standards on social media are lower than in real life. The lecturer points out that nowadays, using social media, people cannot truly distinguish between real and virtual lives. Moreover, in some cases, they even lost social skills.
Secondly, the author claims that social media is a place for cyber -bullying. This is mostly because of the fact that in the online world people do not fear to post things. The lecturer delves deeper into this statement and provides statistics that more than 30% of users have faced such bullying. And one of the reasons is the anonymity on the internet.
Finally, another negative consequence of social media is decreasing in human productivity. People tend to distract and check updates and news on social media. The lecturer makes the point that according to the latest research more than 2 bln dollars lost because of people wasting time on social media. Additionally, he supposes that great work could be done if these hours were dedicated to something valuable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...ace for cyber -bullying. This is mostly because of the fact that in the online world people do not fear ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64452630294 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0355312773 49.2860985944 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.9333333333 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06452816374 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410657092092 0.272083759551 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137618480965 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.235717903492 0.0662205650399 356% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242847931057 0.162205337803 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.172788145937 0.0443174109184 390% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.