Broken window theory
The reading and the lecture are both about the communities suffer from a high rate of crime. The author argues that crime is increasing due to no fixation of the broken window. However, the lecturer refutes the claim by mentioning that broken window theory is just a theory and it is not possible that minor crime begets major crime due to no fixation of the broken window. the lecturer cast doubt on the main point made in the reading by providing three reasons.
To begin with, The author stated that if a few windows in a building are broken and left unrepaired, overtime, criminals will likely commit further crimes. Howbeit, the argument is challenged by the author that the crime is dependent upon the social issue: a lot of teenagers are not occupied, so for living they might do the crime. Thus, the social issue might be the reason for the increase in the crime rate.
In addition, According to the reading police officer is not responding quickly. Nevertheless, the lecturer rebut this by mentioning that it is possible that police officers opt zero-tolerance theory in such a way that some people feel fears to go to the police station and give a report on crime
Finally, the author posits that the broken window is the reason for the conversion of minor crime into a major crime. Nonetheless, lecturer believes that a broken window does not result in vandalism. Moreover, it is wrong to associate the broken window with the crime.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 375, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ue to no fixation of the broken window. the lecturer cast doubt on the main point m...
^^^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...olice station and give a report on crime Finally, the author posits that the brok...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, thus, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1202.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78884462151 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52175185003 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498007968127 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.9443539588 49.2860985944 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.272727273 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09090909091 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358162725964 0.272083759551 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153726635444 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162638462219 0.0662205650399 246% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216331500769 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144990866844 0.0443174109184 327% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.