The article states that the cane toad is a species that deliberately brought to Australia in 1935 and because of its destructive effects, several measures have been proposed to stop the spread of it in Australia. However, the professor explains that the can toad won't be easy to get rid of as the reading suggests and refutes each of the measures.
First, the reading claims that building a national fence is the effective way to prevent the spread of the toad and mention that it will prevent toads to moving into parts of Australia that they have not yet colonized. The author mention that this approach has been used before and it's going to work now. The professor refutes this point by stating that it worked by rabbits but it is not working now. She mentions that young toads and toad's eggs are in the rivers and rivers carry and move the young toads and eggs to the other side of the fences and they establish another colony there.
Second, the article states that toads could be captured and destroyed by volunteers. However, the professor contends that it needs massive groups of people and of course they don't understand the difference between the cane toad and the king toad and so they hurt the population of the king toads.
Third, the reading avers that researchers can develop a virus to control the cane toad populations. The lecture opposes this point by saying that it is a terrible idea and argues that it will kill the king toad and reptiles and as a result, it creates a disaster and the whole area will be suffered.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: IT_IS[19]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... this approach has been used before and its going to work now. The professor refute...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d they establish another colony there. Second, the article states that toads co...
^^^
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ive groups of people and of course they dont understand the difference between the c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third, of course, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 7.30242825607 260% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 274.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64233576642 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34586094265 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492700729927 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 377.1 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.9385110828 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.2 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4 21.698381199 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18713958604 0.272083759551 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074583953791 0.0996497079465 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05358378491 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120093029673 0.162205337803 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334137529284 0.0443174109184 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.2008830022 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.