Chaco structures
The passage puts forth various plausible explanations as to how the Chaco structures were used. The lecturer, however, states that none of these explanations are convincing given the evidence found near them.
Firstly, from outside, the Chaco structures may look like residential buildings. However, if one examines the interiors of these structures, they would come to the conclusion that they were not used as residential buildings because of the number of fire places in the structures. The number of fireplaces in the structures support not more than ten families where as the space available can accommodate more than hundred families. Given this disparity, it is not likely that they were used as residential buildings. This evidence casts doubt on the claim made in the passage which states that the Chaco structures could have been residential dwellings based on their facade.
Secondly, there is no evidence found indicating that they were used as food storage facilities. If they were used to store food, then one should find remains of maize grains or food containers in the excavations. However, nothing of that sort was found indicating that there were not used as food storage facilities contrary to the passage which argues that it could have been one of the purposes of the structures.
Finally, it is true that several broken pots were found in a mound near Pueblo Alto. However, besides broken pots, other materials, especially building materials like sand, stones, etc were also found in the mound. This implies that mound was probably a waste dump. This evidence refutes the passage that claims that the structures would have been used for ceremonial activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...ures support not more than ten families where as the space available can accommodate mor...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...ace available can accommodate more than hundred families. Given this disparity, it is n...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to storing'.
Suggestion: used to storing
...s food storage facilities. If they were used to store food, then one should find remains of m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, as to, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22058823529 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65236396486 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514705882353 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8368999812 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.428571429 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185219315771 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078427899689 0.0996497079465 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12114478474 0.0662205650399 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123755300572 0.162205337803 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0998482244662 0.0443174109184 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.